We the People have been hearing some outlandish prevarications as of late. What is the truth with this administration? What is their course and directive? Are they vying for the good of America, or; are they trying to destroy our country and its heritage? The American dismantlement began before Obama was even sworn into office. It began for this administration with the transition team that was selected specifically for this purpose. Campaign promises were only part of the obfuscation that preceded the presidential inauguration. The former failed systems aka the isms such as Socialism, Communism, Marxism, Leninism, Fascism and anything ending with ism that could be connected to a former failed government on this planet, are being resurrected and renewed in the government led by Obama et al.

A major tool of these narcissistic elitists is propaganda. Many of these current selected leaders came from the hallowed halls of academia. One need only check the history preceding the Hitler administration to find the academically degreed participating and inaugurating many of the policies that precipitated the deaths of millions. These policies were planned and experimented with during the late 1800’s. From the Eugenics teaching and experiments that began in Great Britain and America, the forerunners of mass murder formulated their plans. And…propaganda was instrumental in their success.

First, one has to sell the idea of the necessary adjustments that will be needed and implemented to the people. Create a panic, create a crisis, and then never let a good crisis go to waste. Can the Obama administration lie to the people? Are they lying about this health care proposal? In his book, Lies! Lies! Lies! The Psychology of Deceit, Charles V. Ford (1996: 284) says this: A few people, by virtue of their inherent acting skills-called “natural performers” by Ekman (1992)-are exceptionally good at lying; such individuals can thrive in occupations (such as politics or sales) that place a premium on skilled deception. Individuals who have this skill and who, in addition, have severe character dysfunctions (e.g., narcissistic or antisocial personality disorders) have wreaked, and will continue to wreak, great damage on humanity. And Nietzsche (1886/1967, p.204) says, “The powerful always lie.” So, could this be a flood of propaganda coming from the Obama administration? What is propaganda and how is it used? Propaganda can be used very effectively by evil people to accomplish their purpose. We want to come to a better understanding of this strategy, adroitly used by the human instruments of Satan the devil, their real leader. First the definition:

Propaganda Definition:
Propaganda is a specific type of message presentation aimed at serving an agenda. Even if the message conveys true information, it may be partisan and fail to paint a complete and balanced picture. The primary use of the term is in political contexts, and generally refers to efforts sponsored by governments and political parties. Now the goal:
The goal of propaganda is to garner either support or disapproval of a certain position, rather than to simply present the position. The primary target of propaganda is people’s opinions rather than their knowledge. Therefore, the information conveyed is often presented in an emotionally loaded way and with other means of affecting the opinions of people.
In English, the word “propaganda” often carries strong negative (as well as political) connotations, despite being accepted as a general meaning of “advertising” on rare occasions. This is not necessarily so in other languages, and usage of the term may lead to misunderstanding in communications with non-native English speakers. For example, in Brazil and some Spanish language speaking countries, particularly in the Southern Cone, the word “propaganda” usually means the most common manipulation of information—”advertising.”

There are three major types of propaganda:
1. Name calling
2. Glittering generalities.
3. Euphemisms.

1. Name Calling
“Bad names have played a tremendously powerful role in the history of the world and in our own individual development. They have ruined reputations, stirred men and women to outstanding accomplishments, sent others to prison cells, and made men mad enough to enter battle and slaughter their fellowmen. They have been and are applied to other people, groups, gangs, tribes, colleges, political parties, neighborhoods, and states, sections of the country, nations, and races.” (Institute for Propaganda Analysis, 1938)
The name-calling technique links a person, or idea, to a negative symbol. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject the person or the idea on the basis of the negative symbol, instead of looking at the available evidence.

The most obvious type of name calling involves bad names. For example, consider the following names and epithets hurled at those who oppose the current administration’s agenda, thses include but are not limited to the following; Hitler, Nazi, Terrorist, Right Wing Extremist, Swastika carrying extremists, unruly mobs, etc. etc. There will be more stigmatizing appellations to come.
A more subtle form of name-calling involves words or phrases that are selected because they possess a negative emotional charge. Those who oppose budget cuts may characterize fiscally conservative politicians as “stingy.” Supporters might prefer to describe them as “thrifty.” Both words refer to the same behavior, but they have very different connotations. Other examples of negatively charged words include:

social engineering
radical
cowardly
counter-culture

The name-calling technique was first identified by the Institute for Propaganda Analysis (IPA) in 1938. According to the IPA, we should ask ourselves the following questions when we spot an example of name-calling.
What does the name mean?

Does the idea in question have a legitimate connection with the real meaning of the name?
Is an idea that serves my best interests being dismissed through giving it a name I don’t like?
Leaving the name out of consideration, what are the merits of the idea itself?

If you can effectively attach some identifying epithet (true or not) to an individual, you can work towards generating a negative perception of any individual other then what they truly are. You can effectively neutralize that person, and portray them as evil incarnate, while truly they may be righteous instead.

Propaganda can be used effectively if; the listening audience is lacking intelligence, inclined to mob psychology, or under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The human mind can be a fertile receptive field under the right conditions. This is why propaganda is so effective.
A hypothetical for instance! Let’s say you are having a conversation with someone who would use propaganda to their advantage. You mention the fact that this particular person you both know is a fine upstanding person. The propagandist injects this thought, Oh! They’re ok, with the exception of only having one bad habit, they tell lies! You walk away from that conversation with doubt! Your mind has just received propaganda. The truth of the matter you find out later, after you begin to question that statement is; this individual would never lie no matter what! But the effect has caused you to doubt. This is how it works! Propaganda is designed to create doubt. Propaganda can be composed of half truths and half lies such as are currently spewing from the Obama administration. The epithets used by Speaker Pelosi et al are only an example of name calling and stigmatizing propaganda. Next we want to look at glittering generalities.

A picture’s meaning can express ten thousand words so goes the Chinese saying. I challenge everyone who views this picture and reads this post to run a comparison between what Bismarck, Hitler and now Obama have done or are doing. See if there is a correlation between the two figures in the picture doctrinally and personality wise! Heil Hitler meant Salvation is of or from Hitler, and Obama also has messiah connotations as well. Coincidence…Hardly!

So many times history is repeated because people just never learned their lessons from past historical events. Or; perhaps they think that was a good idea and it just wasn’t time for it then. Socialized medicine is nothing new. In 1884 Prince Otto von Bismarck, Chancellor of Germany, instituted the first modern program of socialized medicine. It was called compulsory national health insurance. However, Bismarck’s scheme failed miserably to provide better medical care for the people of Germany; but it did become an important feature of the German militaristic state; it helped pave the way for Hitler a generation later. There is the historical lesson that failed to make a lasting impression on future generations.

England first started experimenting with socialized medicine in 1911. The experiments were a failure, as they always have been everywhere. And from the Drudge Report comes this item: “SASKATOON — The incoming president of the Canadian Medical Association says this country’s health-care system is sick and doctors need to develop a plan to cure it.

Dr. Anne Doig says patients are getting less than optimal care and she adds that physicians from across the country – who will gather in Saskatoon on Sunday for their annual meeting – recognize that changes must be made.

“We all agree that the system is imploding, we all agree that things are more precarious than perhaps Canadians realize,” Doing said in an interview with The Canadian Press.” And the Canadians have socialized medicine!

Currently, the United States (?) government has proven to be a failure in just about everything they seize control of. Socialized medicine is just another government intrusion and seizure. This program is destined for failure no matter who or what fights to implement this financial monstrosity!

The Declaration of Independence says the following: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

We the people are seemingly no longer the people who place the President, the Senate, Congressmen et al into power. Our voice is seemingly ignored and silenced when we do speak out against actions of our elected officials. Tyrannical governments seek to silence its’ constituents. The ordered liberty concept can be either balanced with excessive liberty not becoming anarchical in concept because of no restraints imposed on the governed or; order can become tyrannical in concept when excessive Rules of Law are imposed in the name of necessity. The scales of balance are tipping towards the tyrannical unbalanced side by the Democratic Party and their controlling positions both in the House and Senate. To make matters worse, if possible, the President is also of the Democratic Party.

Have we the people no say or control of legislations that will ultimately affect us as citizens? Are we the people now at the mercy and under the control of despotic dictatorial leadership? When did America become ensconced with the Gulag mentality of Stalin and Lenin’s Russia of bygone eras? Personally, the current ruling administration and their coterie do not have my consent because they are not anchored in the foundational documents of America the primary one being the Constitution. When tyrannical governmental figures want to seize control of the entire system of government, they will either rewrite or abolish any documentation in opposition to their agenda, either overtly or covertly, with one thought in mind, change the rules of the playing field to suit their agenda. The Communist Rules for Revolution contain the following supposedly written in the early 1900’s.

“Always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible. By encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit; produce years of inflation with rising prices and general discontent.” Well, by all means this is taking place before our very eyes (if we are not blind of course) in today’s administration. This current administration are seizing power as quickly as possible and introducing legislation that will make every citizen of the United States of America…a Slave! Everything the forefathers and the succeeding generations have fought and died for becomes mute! Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness will be a thing of the past because of the abject slavery that we are being encumbered with, and not by our consent! The governed never gave those who they placed in power the right to place them into slavery. Or; is it Obama’s et al plan to give Americans a taste of what the black people have gone through all these years? Is there some subversive plan for requital for past injurious inflictions to black people et al?

But; there seems to be a plan a lot larger than retribution and retaliation here. The plan is to turn America into a Communist type nation such as was in the failed (communistic) systems of Europe past. There are definite underpinnings of Stalin, Lenin, Marx in the actions of Obama and his coterie. Community organizer…? Ha! More like Community Revolutionist against anything American. This is all being done without the consent of the governed because posers/wannabees are using double speak language to keep the American people from knowledge of what they are doing…exactly! How about some examples of double speak?

1. Layoff, downsize, rightsize, headcount adjustment, RIF (reduction in force), realignment: mass dismissal of employees, usually due to business restructuring or economic conditions, or just not wanting to pay their benefits package at retirement
2. Public donation, shared sacrifice, public service: taxes, taxes, taxes
3. Job seekers: the unemployed, the laid off, the fired, no longer hirable
4. Asylum seekers: refugees , terrorists, illegal’s
5. Undocumented aliens: (US) illegal aliens
6. Freedom fighter: political rebel, activist, community organizer, revolutionist, Alinsky
7. Euthanasia: killing old people, deleting the useless eaters

As we of Native American (those with genetic inheritances) descent would say, they speak with forked tongue. They say one thing but mean another. The language of Obama and his coterie is masked in double-speak. What are their actual intentions? And do they have the consent of the governed? No, I do not believe they do because of their agenda of ramming their legislation through by threat, coercion and political force, and many times done at night or on weekends when people are sleeping! My, is this the problem..? The people are sleeping? We the people must once again take control and be governed by consent…ours!

This should be one of the major considerations for the GOP’s next presidential candidate. The people are tired of dysfunctional families and the political hacks that lead them. Is the GOP seeking the quintessential candidate, or are they just looking for a nice face on top with nothing between the ears but vacuousness (stupidity) where the brain should be? Should the GOP be seeking candidates with sordid pasts and scandal implications as resume requisites? Should the GOP follow the Democrats pattern of acceptance for any immoral and debauchery laden background? The GOP was supposed to be the party of morals and family oriented. The leader presents a party format, as is the leader, so is the party and its’ constituents, well mostly. The Bible talks of the time when Aaron loosed the people, and when he made the golden calf as an idol to be worshipped. The true leader, a strict moralist, was absent from their location, and while he was gone the people were loosed and their moral focus and moral compass was absent from their lives.

If the GOP fields an amoral candidate what will be the outcome? Will the people look upon the candidate’s immoral failings as an example to do the same? Will placing an adulterer or adulteress on the ticket for example, signify approval of this amoral behavior? Will the people think that it’s okay to commit adultery because the candidate did and look where they are, running for the office of president! No, because morals are still important! In his book Common Morality: Deciding What to Do (2004) Bernard Gert proposes ten moral rules which, if followed, create a moral system. The rules are as follows:

1. Do not kill
2. Do not cause pain
3. Do not disable
4. Do not deprive of freedom
5. Do not deprive of pleasure
6. Do not deceive
7. Keep your promises
8. Do not cheat
9. Obey the law
10. Do your duty

If the GOP can field a candidate that follows the Biblical Ten Commandments and can acknowledge Gert’s ten moral rules, they could once again capture the attention of America’s conservative voters. However, if it is business as usual, the GOP offers an amoral candidate with a dysfunctional family that flaunts their immoral actions; you can just stay home or not enter a preference when you are faced with the GOP vs. the Democrat choice for president at the voting booth 2012.

Why should the GOP place these kinds of people and then rub them in the people’s faces as the GOP choice (S) like it or not? Do you honestly think we want a morally used (amoral) or spent candidate? Do you honestly think that everyone is committing adultery or debauchery so it’s okay to run a candidate that did or still does? What is the problem with this picture, and why does the political wannabees continue to want center stage when they can’t even qualify for the office of dog catcher where they reside? We are being bombarded by a has been beauty queen that attended five different colleges in a six year span of time, with less than two semesters at most, she finally received a B.S. in communications with an emphasis in journalism from the University of Idaho. By every university standard offering this degree curriculum this degree should be easier to achieve in less time than that. However, what you have is a former beauty queen that can talk/communicate, a vacuous yakking beauty queen at that! And her college GPA is suggested to be fairly low, and that was obvious during her first speaking attempts. So, what is your point on that?

My point can be understood if one were to use the right head to seriously evaluate the person from a requirement point of view. Why can’t the GOP find an intelligent accomplished woman to run for the office of president, shall we say someone like Condoleeza Rice for example? Why can’t the GOP find a well educated woman to place on the ballot? I’ll tell you why, because the qualified (and emphasis on qualified) women are not face or body beautiful and they just don’t look good in a bathing suit. The GOP would rather field a former beauty queen that looks good in PR photos and a bathing suit. Regardless that this individual is the atypical vacuous beauty queen that rides the wave on looks without the necessary mental capacity or capabilities to run this country. GOP, if you are reading this…what are you thinking? Do you seriously think that you can place anyone this fatuous in serious contention? You think it was bad when she was selected for McCain’s running mate, just wait until the next time (should she be stupid enough to run) when the Democratic hit machine gets up and running, they will devour her in short order.

What America needs is candidates that do not and have not committed adultery or any other sexual immorality. America needs candidates who do not do drugs or drink alcohol excessively and whose family members don’t either. America needs candidates that do not have children who participate in sexual activity without being married and bring forth children out of wedlock. America needs candidates that live above the foul morass of the amorality in the Democrat Party and those who are devoid of any values whatsoever. America needs candidates they can look up to, not candidates they can compare themselves to, and then say, at least I’m better than they are, while they continue practicing abominable behavior because of the provided bad examples by the GOP et al parties. The pattern (s) of America’s leaders should be above reproach! America needs moral relevance not immoral insignificance.

Has America had enough? Is it time for change in our government and political parties? The Democratic Party is changing America into another form of Communism such as Socialism. The GOP Republican Party is becoming obfuscated on identity and purpose. So what is the best choice for America? What does America and its’ constituents want or desire? Do Americans still want freedoms as guaranteed by the foundational documents of America? Does America still want family values and morals? If we answer yes to these questions, can the political parties now extant provide these basic necessities to remain a free and independent democracy? The answer to that is no! No, these parties are basically the same in practice and the lines between them is merging daily.
So, what is the answer? What does the Constitution say? What does the Declaration of Independence say? The later document sets the tone for the current political parties and the current governments disobliges. There comes a time for change, and if the political parties can no longer listen to “We the People” then it is time to implement the following taken from the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.”

The time has now come to alter and or abolish the current political parties as they no longer serve their constituents and the government of these United States of America. This form of government now instituted at the inauguration of President Obama has become destructive to these ends as framed in the Declaration and the Constitution. The Constitution is not a document that was implemented to be abolished or open to radical interpretation according to any person or party ideology. “When the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?” The changes that need attention are not by any means trivial or light. The safety and well being of true Americans are now in question. The financial security, prosperity and free market enterprise are becoming past tense. When life savings can be taken away from workers and investors, and when a company/government no longer wants to pay them (the workers) their hard earned benefits, which they legitimately earned, the financial security no longer exists. When a government declares war on successful financially responsible people, they lose their safety and future security.

When the government and political parties no longer derive their power from the consent of the governed, and when they become tyrants along the same line as/of the King of England…! A classic example can be seen in the escalating taxes, monetary mismanagement, and budget deficits that cannot be understood or even comprehended, it is time for the people to take the power away from these despots, these political hacks that only seek their own welfare at the expense of the people. The time has come to institute a new party of the people, by the people and for the people. This party must be constituted of dedicated conservative men and women having the welfare of this country and its people as their primary focus and agenda. The leadership must be above reproach with a high moral compass. The GOP (quasi) was supposed to be the party of family values, morals; however, they have fallen from their lofty status and have become the party of failure along these lines. People putting themselves forward in the GOP are tainted by their adulterous indiscretions and weaknesses of the flesh. The leading candidates for the next presidential race should not even be spouting their agenda on any media outreach or forum.

Let me make myself perfectly clear on this because the people in contention for the next presidential race should not even be seriously considered. People like the adulterous Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Sarah Palin, et al must be rejected as viable candidates because of their willful indiscretions. If America elects these kinds of people to any office anywhere, they are taking a step backwards and the morals of America will decline even further. Can anyone of a high moral character look up to these kinds of people for an example of what one should become or be? Absolutely not! It is time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their country. Oh, do you think I have become too pontificating and condescending with these requirements for elective office? Yes, all have sinned and fallen short, and there is forgiveness for sins, and the people who commit sin deserve another opportunity to make good. However, there are so many people just like King David that must have the sin and or confession of such dug out of them! They will not disclose their sins willingly, but, they have to be caught red handed and exposed in order to stop or even confess their trysts. Yes, people can repent! Yes people can pay for their sins and crimes, as this happens all the time. But, should some of these kinds of people be considered for the office of the President of the United States of America? Remember Bill Clinton? Now is that a good example for children to follow? Remember Spitzer, Vitter, Ensign, Sanford, Craig et al, to name a few? I rest my case. There will be more on this!

One of the worst atrocities perpetrated upon the American people are the unpatriotic acts/actions of the 20th and 21st century capitalists. Perhaps one would think that this is a rather harsh assessment? Perhaps a little truth shock is needed to see the real intentions of the capitalists and their design for America and its’ people. The capitalists are not patriotic as can be seen in their business dealings, the evacuation of their businesses from American shores, and then reestablishing them in foreign countries. When we were given a free land because our forefathers could no longer deal with the tyranny and oppression of their former European et al countries, they came to the shores of a country now called America. Their departure from the virtual slavery/subjugation imposed on them via oppressive laws, taxations, and the absence of the right to protest these oppressing burdens, eventually brought upon them a war that they did not seek. The Revolutionary War was fought for freedom; freedom from the oppression of England’s overbearing control and excessive subjugation of the new colonies in America. Forthrightly; the people wanted to be free from England and free from many other countries that continuously oppressed their people.

Capitalism’s fundamental reason for existence is to create or make wealth with an initial investment. The profits usually went to one person while the burden of creating that wealth was the result of many workers labor which was capitalized on with small wages for services rendered. Supposedly, the capitalist took the initial risk by their financial investment so; they were the primary beneficiaries of this investment. Nothing has changed since the onset of the capitalist agenda…perhaps noble (?) at first but more mercenary in today’s avaricious corporate structures. The bottom line is all that counts…no matter what or who. Capitalists want to make money at the expense of their workers. They are not willing to share their profit except it be in the form of yearend bonuses that really only serve to quiet the workers and make them continue to produce for their company. This minuscule token is really nowhere near what the worker (s) does for this company in work and benefits. Many workers are very skilled at their position and the corporate structure realizes more in worker return than in their token gifts, wages, and small benefit packages that they bestow upon the workers overall.

The real problem occurring over the past few decades can be seen in capitalism’s true intentions. If one were to consider themselves to be patriotic, would they support America’s workforce? Would one support this wonderful country for the blessings received? Being born in a free land with more than ample opportunities to become successful, if that’s what you want, can be achieved in America. However, along with these advantages come responsibilities. The responsibilities to remain Americans with the good of the country and its people should be a primary consideration…wouldn’t you think? Then why is it that the capitalists are now evacuating the shores of America and taking their businesses to foreign countries? Why are these same capitalists taking our goods offshore to be manufactured by people in a foreign country? Are these people/capitalists patriotic in any sense of the word or definition? No; absolutely not! These people are unpatriotic traitors of the lowest level. No longer content to exploit America’s work force, they now go to foreign countries to exploit the people there! Why pay $15.00 an hour when you can pay $2.00 an hour (or less) for work performed. And, no benefit packages are necessary in foreign countries!

The capitalist cannot share their fortunes with the people that actually made this fortune for them and their company. What does it take to place a little money into a quasi capitalist adventure? There is not too much blood, sweat and tears at this level. The real producers at the worker level are the ones that actually make the money for their respective companies of employment when all things are considered! The corporate leaders can only take the bow and the profit from the labor of others. These parasitic unpatriotic people at the corporate head should be ashamed of themselves for not supporting the land (America) into which they were born and the people that live and try to make a living here. The jobless rate continues to escalate! The benefit packages of the workers who invested their entire working life in the company they worked for are now gone or disappearing! And this could have been prevented by placing America and its people first and the profit line after.

Where is all this headed? Does anyone believe in the Bible and its prophecies, predictions today? Well if you do, there will be vengeance and havoc wreaked upon all of these capitalists who took advantage of the poor working force of America, and all those who put into place and practice these same exploitative agendas in foreign countries. Let’s read a couple of things concerning this and then we will wait for the other shoe to fall on these avaricious unpatriotic people! “What mean you that you crush my people, and grind the face of the poor says the Sovereign Yahweh of hosts?” Isaiah 3:15 “Come now, you rich, weep and howl for your miseries that are coming upon you. Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold and your silver are rusted; and their rust shall be for a testimony against you, and shall eat your flesh as fire. You have laid up your treasure in the last days. Behold the hire of the laborers who mowed your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, cries out: and the cries of them that reaped have entered into the ears of Yahweh of Hosts. James 5:1-4

Yes, these unpatriotic capitalist raiders do crush the people; they place heavy burdens as in the days of Egypt, make bricks without straw. Pay your mortgages and car payments without any jobs because they have been taken to foreign countries. Make your living without a decent wage while the prices continue to escalate such as ascending gas prices in the midst of a gas glut and oil surplus. Yes, they keep back the wages while their bottom line continues to increase. They always want you to believe they are not making money but they continue to operate don’t they? Yes, many companies are going under and do you think this is a coincidence after reading the aforementioned Biblical passages? Not hardly! Yes fellow patriotic Americans as they say…” paybacks are hell!” And behold…it comes!

“…When generating a lie or a false response, one must know the truth, resist the impulse to answer truthfully, and further generate an alternative but appropriate response.” – J.M. Nuñez et. al.

Is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi a pathological liar? Does she have dissociative identity disorder (DID)? Or…is she just plain schizophrenic? Which Pelosi is it that speaks on any given day? What did she know and when did she know it?

Dissociative Identity Disorder (Multiple Personality Disorder)

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) is a severe condition in which two or more distinct identities, or personality states, are present in—and alternately take control of—an individual. The person also experiences memory loss that is too extensive to be explained by ordinary forgetfulness. Considering the verbal fluctuations in Pelosi’s present stand on the torture techniques of the CIA and being briefed on this in 2002. Pelosi was briefed by the CIA in 2002 along with three additional congressional leaders, where Pelosi was informed of enhanced interrogation techniques, and was told that White House lawyers concluded that waterboarding was legal. Does Pelosi have selective/convenient amnesia? What is selective/convenient amnesia?

Selective/convenient amnesia – amnesia about particular events that is very convenient for the person who cannot remember. Why do some politicians always develop selective amnesia when questioned about their transgressions? Is Pelosi lying? Are her lips moving? It does appear that she is sidestepping and dancing around the real truth of the matter. Gail Satz talked recently with Katie Couric about why people lie. Here is some of what she said.

“Everybody lies. It may only be “white” lies, but everyone tells lies or “omits the truth” sometimes. We start lying at around age 4 to 5 when children gain an awareness of the use and power of language. This first lying is not malicious, but rather to find out, or test, what can be manipulated in a child’s environment. Eventually children begin to use lying to get out of trouble or get something they want. White lies, those concocted to protect someone’s feelings, are not a big deal at all. The person, however, who seems to feel compelled to lie about both the small and large stuff has a problem. We often call these folks pathological liars (which is a description, not a diagnosis). They lie to protect themselves, look good, gain financially or socially and avoid punishment. Quite often the person who has been deceived knows that this type of liar has to a certain extent deluded him or herself and is therefore to be somewhat pitied. A much more troubling group is those who lie a lot — and knowingly — for personal gain. These people may have a diagnosis called antisocial personality disorder, also known as being a sociopath” (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4072816/).

Is Nancy Pelosi regressing to her childhood wherein she probably began lying? It would appear that she is exhibiting the same traits of a 4 or 5 year old child who lies to keep from getting into trouble. Why Nancy do you think you would be taken to the woodshed if you were caught lying? Pathological lying has been compared with the “pseudolying” observed in children. Despite their obvious comparability, it is important to draw a distinction between the “fantasy” lying observed in children and pathological lying. Children’s use of fantasy to deny reality is said to be an important aspect of self-development and self-protection, but when this persists into adulthood, it becomes pathological. It has been proposed that the pathological liar’s ego is fixated at the childhood level (DSM-IV). Pathological is defined as; of, relating to, or manifesting behavior that is habitual, maladaptive, and compulsive. Or is Pelosi just plain schizophrenic? Is there two Nancy Pelosi’s? One that concurs with the majority on certain issues but then shifts and changes her mind when she is called into question by the lunatic fringe?

For the record…do I believe in torture? Should we take extreme measures when America is under attack by enemies foreign or domestic? There should be a contingency clause in any method of interrogation wherein masses of lives are in jeopardy by possible bomb annihilation. There are times when the situation warrants the use of interrogations beyond normal atypical question and answer sessions that seek a confession of guilt. Sometimes the use of truth serum should be implemented. Would that be too extreme for those in opposition to torture of any kind? Probably! Remember, some (perhaps many or most) of those in opposition to torture were against spanking children and you can see where that has taken us in America? Is Pelosi lying? Yes! She should fess-up and tell the truth with a so-what attitude concerning her critics and left of sane opposition. Truth will always stand on its’ own merits! Personally…I’m a Jack Bauer fan…so you know where I’m coming from on this quasi torture issue!

“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself–nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance” Franklin Delano Roosevelt, First Inaugural Address, Mar. 4, 1933, sage advice from one of the leading proponents of the Democratic Party. Why the mass hysteria and fear in the Democratic Party? You say what fear, what hysteria? Take a close look at the agenda of the Democratic Party now in power. Why would there be a need to pass legislation that implements a federal “hate crimes” plan? H.R. 1913 focuses on stopping certain agendas not in agreement with the Socialist/Fascist Left now in power. This legislation will be target specific. This legislation will be directed to anyone that speaks or writes about homosexuality in a negative way that would condemn the practice called “abomination” in Leviticus 18:22 and “reprobate mind” in Romans 1:27-28. The plain truth of this matter is the homosexual community just doesn’t want to hear this type of condemning dialog. They do not want to be told that their behavior is evil and unacceptable. So they will do everything possible to avoid the label and stigma of their inordinate lifestyle.

In seeking extra protection the homosexual seeks to forestall eradication or persecution. The homosexual community has tried everything to make their abhorrent lifestyle acceptable to the human race. They had the APA change their definition and designation. They had the stigmatizing term GRID (Gay-related immune deficiency) changed to a more acceptable acronym AIDS (Acquired immune deficiency syndrome). This illusion was to avoid any direct connection of origin concerning this terrible disease that infected homosexuals. They also had the laws changed regarding the illegality of sodomy and now because of the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court Lawrence v. Texas decision this behavior was taken into the legal forced compliance arena that now affords them (homosexuals) safety when they conduct their sexual liaisons. Systematically the forced changes have degraded and denigrated the institution of marriage between one man and one woman. And all of this is because they fear being eradicated for their behavior. If according to them that this is acceptable behavior why all of the deceit and treacherous activity to protect themselves? They are living in and with fear, and well they should be! If history is any reference/indicator to this behavior, they will be wiped out in due time.

Another fear of the Socialist Fascist Left is an overthrow of their government. They want to stop the freedom of speech of Ministers and Talk Show Hosts that speak in opposition to their agenda. So, now they want to censor talk radio and this will include religious preachers that speak the real truth concerning plans for their totalitarian regime. This agenda is no different than Rome, Germany, and now the United States and eventually all countries of the world that will be brought under their governmental power. First they must shut up the opposition so they will implement media censorship that will include radio, newspapers, Internet news and blog sites et al. The First Amendment rights will be reinterpreted to mean other things such as the yelling of fire in a theatre will now be applied abstractly instead of literally. It will acquire a new intension that now means something entirely different. Instead of yelling fire (in a theatre) the new interpretation will be any oral presentation (s) that contain their idea of what hate speech now is, will be unacceptable. Well…sort of, because, the First Amendment has already been stretched to cover indecorous practices already. How can we interpret free speech as allowing the possession and viewing of pornography, nude art, and scatological presentations? Anyway, this is another fear that the left of the sane line lives with.

Another problem for true patriotic Americans will be the forced compliance of their gun law legislation. Perhaps they will create another crisis such as 911 to implement a gun seizure plan. This is not new in governments that will do anything to stay in power. Hitler used the same tactic and method to reduce or eliminate the possibility of being overthrown. “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.” –Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426.

You think this can’t happen, well you are sadly mistaken. Remember it was University intelligence and intelligent people that supported Hitler. Big business supported and financed Hitler. Propaganda was used for Hitler’s position acceleration and establishment. Propaganda was used against Hitler’s enemies. This current administration is engaging in a constant propaganda diatribe. So, in all actuality, there is nothing new under the sun. And, they are promulgating once again the Fascist/Socialist agenda of Hitler’s bygone and dead era!

Well, America must suffer under another Janet, as if Janet Reno wasn’t enough! It would appear that the left of the sane line such as socialists, fascists, and liberals in general, are targeting anything to the right of the sane line. One needs to remember just who and what these people represent. Fascists were in vogue during the early part of the twentieth century. Two despot leaders that rose during this era with socialistic and fascist agendas were Hitler and Mussolini. Similarly, Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party adapted fascism to Germany beginning in 1933, said:

“The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property.” (Barkai 1990, pp. 26–27) Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill.” (p. 280) So, where is America now headed? The socialists and fascists are now in power and the two shall become as one for the good of their cause and party. However, there are some inconvenient stumbling blocks that these left of the sane line must overcome. One is to gain control and remotion of all guns either by complete eradication and seizure or, have them locked up for use on specific occasions like hunting or target shooting, can we say England’s gun control methods here? By creating a quasi need for gun control (euphemism for complete seizure) the socialist/fascist party now in power will create the opportunity for this occurrence. Think Hitler here and here is a reminder of how that went down during his reign.

“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.” –Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426.

Janet Napolitano’s mindless diatribe concerning “Extremists” is only a portend for what lies ahead. When you verbally indict our military veterans current or past, and then stigmatize them with the extremist’s appellative/appellation, you are labeling them in the same way the Hitler did during his lunatic tenure as leader of Germany. Why is Napolitano concerned over the military aspect and labeling them as extremists? No rocket science needed here to answer that one. She is acting on behalf of the scared and threatened party she now is goose stepping to/for. Their problem (socialists/fascists) is getting into power and then keeping that power no matter what. They are afraid that their regime will be toppled and who better than trained military personnel to accomplish something like that? Hitler worried about being overthrown as aforementioned in his own words.

It appears that Napolitano is putting into effect the agenda of the less than sane liberal left. What distraction will she create to impose their absolute control agendas? Will she find another Waco to burn to the ground? Will she invade the homes of private citizens and seize their guns? What about militia groups that she perceives as a threat, how will she justify her aggressive “extremist” delusions about them really wanting to take over America so we just had to stop them? Or…will she actually have the government agencies blow up another Murrah Building after she orders some “extremist” stronghold burnt to the ground just like the other Janet (Reno) did at Waco, Texas? It appears that the name Janet has a common mental denominator here. And for America and its’ people that is not good! Personally, they should get Janet Napolitano out of this office before she sets America on fire, not only with words but with Gestapo orchestrated manifestations. Maybe she will even have the audacity to attack Chuck Norris and label him as an “extremist,” want to wish you well on that one Janet!

”Let every soul be subject to higher authorities, for there is no authority except from Elohim, but the existing authorities have been ordained by Yahweh. So that the one resisting authority has opposed the ordinance of Yahweh, and the ones opposing will receive judgment to themselves.” Romans 13:1-2
Why is it that supposed (quasi) Bible believing individuals really do not understand or even know what they believe or from whence comes their beliefs. Most will say that they believe what the Bible teaches, however, this is not always the case. Since President Obama was elected to the office of Presidency there has been a concerted movement to have him removed via lawsuits and or by fiat when the case arises to SCOTUS, if possible. Now…if you truly believe what the Bible teaches how do leaders become such…by the will of men or by the decree of the Supreme Ruler of the Universe? “But Yahweh is the judge; He puts down one and sets up another.” Psalm 75:7. So, how does this fit in the scheme of things concerning rulers of the countries of the world? Depending on what you believe concerning the selection and ordination of rulers is how you will react to any leader in any position.

One element that is sorely lacking is respect for the chosen leaders of the assorted countries in this current world and system of things. If you truly believe the Bible could you lift up your hand against Yahweh’s anointed? Meaning the one that He sets up to be the ruler of any given country at any time in history past, and present. My point is this! In all good conscience can one actually say they believe what the Bible teaches and treat rulers with disdain and disrespect? It comes to this…if you say you believe in the Bible’s teachings and you challenge, disparage, and maltreat the one that is elected to the office of the President of the United States, you are a lying hypocrite. One of the major…main reasons that I personally despise John McCain is because of the disrespect that he openly showed the past President George Bush. McCain is a supposed military man supposedly serving this country and vows/displays allegiance to America and the high office of the President…but does he? No, absolutely not! He revealed his true colors when he displayed a total attitude of disrespect to then President Bush. And…President Bush was the Commander in Chief of the military! What does that say about the true morals and beliefs of John McCain? Plenty! Ever wonder why some leaders just go cuckoo? Read the following passage.

“And you shall be driven from men, and your dwelling shall be with the beasts of the field. You shall be fed with the grass like oxen, and seven times shall pass over you until you know that the Most High is Ruler in the kingdom of men, and that He gives it to whomever He desires.” Daniel 4:32 This leader in Daniel’s era was sent away to become as a beast without reason. From the office of King to the pastures of a beast, and an animal’s mind all because he failed to remember who does what in this earth. The resolution is in this, And at the end of days, I Nebuchadnezzar lifted up my eyes to Heaven, and my understanding returned to me, and I blessed the Most High, and I praised and honored Him who lives forever, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and His rule is from generation to generation.” Daniel 4:34 Yes, his understanding returned when he acknowledged the source of all powers whether that be in the Heaven’s above or on earth beneath.
Now I ask you, Farah, Keyes et al, do you really think you are doing the right thing in challenging the President’s elected position? I mean from the standpoint that you both (or so you say) believe what the Bible teaches? I will caution all of you to be very careful what you do with this man. How do you know if this man falls into the following or not? Romans 9:17 “For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very thing I raised you up, so that I might display My power in you, and so that My name might be publicized in all the earth.” (Ex. 9:16) If this man is one of the final leaders on this earth…you do believe that the Kingdom is soon to come don’t you? How then can you in all good conscience challenge (ATTACK) the President under the guise of ineligible by constitutional requirements. Where in Heaven’s Name were the Congress, the Senate, America when this man should have been vetted prior to even entering the race for President? I would if I were you rethink your entire position on this because you are going to find yourself in opposition to the true Kingmaker…Yahweh!

I will leave you with one more thought…one more warning from scripture…the words of Zechariah 12:3 “And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all the peoples; all that burden themselves with it shall be sore wounded; and all the nations of the earth shall be gathered together against it.” Every person that has tried to bring about the division of Jerusalem and who wants to controvert the Jewish people’s rights have failed because eventually they are taken to task as this passage says. Hillary Clinton will find herself on the wrong side of this Palestinian foolishness she is now perpetrating. In opposing the Jewish state by calling for a Palestinian statehood she is in effect siding with those who want Israel’s demise. And do you believe in Jerusalem…Israel and the punishment you will receive if you try to harm these people?