Mac’s Between The Eyes!

Straightforward Commentary!

Is Palin the Second Coming, or What?

Well, it doesn’t seem to take too much to entertain some folks these days. Their latest “next big thing” seems to be more of a carnal fetish and wishful thinking than reality. Truly America has been dumbed down by the obsession of someone who couldn’t even write her own book! Lynn Vincent it seems, is the actual author of the quasi “Going Rogue” that mind numbed and dumbed down people are salivating over currently. Al Neuharth in his weekly USA Today column posits that this title is misleading. Neuharth says, “She is no “rogue.” Webster’s dictionary has these definitions of a rogue:

1. “Vagrant, tramp.

2. “A dishonest or worthless person.

3. “Scoundrel.

4. “A mischievous person.”

Palin has some qualities of the last. But the other definitions of “rogue” simply do not fit her… As is often the case, the title for Palin’s book was concocted by publicity seekers. They do not care whether a title describes a book or its author, as long as it sells.” I concur with Neuharth on this one, because I personally believe that she is a poser and disingenuous overall. There are still some outstanding personal issues that she needs to address and it seems that she is hoping they will just go away. The major issue of concern for me and any other moralist is; her extramarital activities with her current husband Todd’s former business partner Brad Hanson. Well, perhaps you don’t believe me on this? I say; do your homework and find out what really happened. Although you may not agree with the reporting source for this story, the National Inquirer, it is the same paper that reported the adulterous affair of once presidential candidate, John Edwards.

So, if we follow the evidence we can arrive at a conclusion as to this story’s veracity. The threat of a lawsuit was initially threatened against the National Inquirer however, that never materialized. Brad Hanson had his divorce papers sealed because of this revelation. Wonder why? If one did not commit adultery then they have nothing to hide, do they? If someone accuses you or I of committing adultery and we are innocent, what would be our course of action? Can we say lawsuit? So you see, actions or lack thereof are very revealing. So Palin needs to come clean. Besides, do we really need a vacuous ex-beauty queen and her dysfunctional family leading anything in this country?

Another issue can be seen in her photo shoot for a recent Runner’s World story; Sarah Palin appears to have committed an act that could shock Republican supporters: breaking the American “flag code.” The magazine features a picture of Palin leaning on a flag draped over a chair—apparently violating rules against “bunching up” the flag and using it as “drapery,” notes Katy Kelleher for Jezebel. Should Palin wrap herself in the American flag or lean on it as she has done for her quasi patriotic photo ops? No, because the Flag Code states that the flag should never be worn. (Section 8d): “The flag should never be used as wearing apparel.” Another point of disgust is the photo for the “Runner’s World” magazine that was co-opted by “Newsweek” magazine for their cover also. This depiction is what many men really like her for, because you can be sure it’s not her brain they are seeking or staring at! The little head is moving these weak minded men, if you can call them that. There should be some outrage over this because so many quasi conservative people are supposed to be family oriented and they should stand against these displays. And she condemns Levi Johnson for his Playgirl photo op!

Based on the Webster’s definition of this so-called, “Rogue” does America really want this type of person anywhere near public office? If so, how have we fallen! The constant parade of amoral people for electoral considerations for high office and thereafter a cushy pension is nothing short of obscene, as are the candidates. Are there not in America some good wholesome ethical and moral people without the adultery baggage that will run for office? Personally, I am aroused because of this candidate garbage dump on the American people as if to say to us, this is your choice and it’s the only one you get. Besides, Palin is only eye candy (with her makeup on) for the depraved of mind, not really viable in the intellectual circles. But who knows, maybe that is what America now deserves at this point in time for the multitude of transgression committed within it!

November 26, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Horse Manure of a Different Color!

Horse Manure copy
We the People have been hearing some outlandish prevarications as of late. What is the truth with this administration? What is their course and directive? Are they vying for the good of America, or; are they trying to destroy our country and its heritage? The American dismantlement began before Obama was even sworn into office. It began for this administration with the transition team that was selected specifically for this purpose. Campaign promises were only part of the obfuscation that preceded the presidential inauguration. The former failed systems aka the isms such as Socialism, Communism, Marxism, Leninism, Fascism and anything ending with ism that could be connected to a former failed government on this planet, are being resurrected and renewed in the government led by Obama et al.

A major tool of these narcissistic elitists is propaganda. Many of these current selected leaders came from the hallowed halls of academia. One need only check the history preceding the Hitler administration to find the academically degreed participating and inaugurating many of the policies that precipitated the deaths of millions. These policies were planned and experimented with during the late 1800’s. From the Eugenics teaching and experiments that began in Great Britain and America, the forerunners of mass murder formulated their plans. And…propaganda was instrumental in their success.

First, one has to sell the idea of the necessary adjustments that will be needed and implemented to the people. Create a panic, create a crisis, and then never let a good crisis go to waste. Can the Obama administration lie to the people? Are they lying about this health care proposal? In his book, Lies! Lies! Lies! The Psychology of Deceit, Charles V. Ford (1996: 284) says this: A few people, by virtue of their inherent acting skills-called “natural performers” by Ekman (1992)-are exceptionally good at lying; such individuals can thrive in occupations (such as politics or sales) that place a premium on skilled deception. Individuals who have this skill and who, in addition, have severe character dysfunctions (e.g., narcissistic or antisocial personality disorders) have wreaked, and will continue to wreak, great damage on humanity. And Nietzsche (1886/1967, p.204) says, “The powerful always lie.” So, could this be a flood of propaganda coming from the Obama administration? What is propaganda and how is it used? Propaganda can be used very effectively by evil people to accomplish their purpose. We want to come to a better understanding of this strategy, adroitly used by the human instruments of Satan the devil, their real leader. First the definition:

Propaganda Definition:
Propaganda is a specific type of message presentation aimed at serving an agenda. Even if the message conveys true information, it may be partisan and fail to paint a complete and balanced picture. The primary use of the term is in political contexts, and generally refers to efforts sponsored by governments and political parties. Now the goal:
The goal of propaganda is to garner either support or disapproval of a certain position, rather than to simply present the position. The primary target of propaganda is people’s opinions rather than their knowledge. Therefore, the information conveyed is often presented in an emotionally loaded way and with other means of affecting the opinions of people.
In English, the word “propaganda” often carries strong negative (as well as political) connotations, despite being accepted as a general meaning of “advertising” on rare occasions. This is not necessarily so in other languages, and usage of the term may lead to misunderstanding in communications with non-native English speakers. For example, in Brazil and some Spanish language speaking countries, particularly in the Southern Cone, the word “propaganda” usually means the most common manipulation of information—”advertising.”

There are three major types of propaganda:
1. Name calling
2. Glittering generalities.
3. Euphemisms.

1. Name Calling
“Bad names have played a tremendously powerful role in the history of the world and in our own individual development. They have ruined reputations, stirred men and women to outstanding accomplishments, sent others to prison cells, and made men mad enough to enter battle and slaughter their fellowmen. They have been and are applied to other people, groups, gangs, tribes, colleges, political parties, neighborhoods, and states, sections of the country, nations, and races.” (Institute for Propaganda Analysis, 1938)
The name-calling technique links a person, or idea, to a negative symbol. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject the person or the idea on the basis of the negative symbol, instead of looking at the available evidence.

The most obvious type of name calling involves bad names. For example, consider the following names and epithets hurled at those who oppose the current administration’s agenda, thses include but are not limited to the following; Hitler, Nazi, Terrorist, Right Wing Extremist, Swastika carrying extremists, unruly mobs, etc. etc. There will be more stigmatizing appellations to come.
A more subtle form of name-calling involves words or phrases that are selected because they possess a negative emotional charge. Those who oppose budget cuts may characterize fiscally conservative politicians as “stingy.” Supporters might prefer to describe them as “thrifty.” Both words refer to the same behavior, but they have very different connotations. Other examples of negatively charged words include:

social engineering
radical
cowardly
counter-culture

The name-calling technique was first identified by the Institute for Propaganda Analysis (IPA) in 1938. According to the IPA, we should ask ourselves the following questions when we spot an example of name-calling.
What does the name mean?

Does the idea in question have a legitimate connection with the real meaning of the name?
Is an idea that serves my best interests being dismissed through giving it a name I don’t like?
Leaving the name out of consideration, what are the merits of the idea itself?

If you can effectively attach some identifying epithet (true or not) to an individual, you can work towards generating a negative perception of any individual other then what they truly are. You can effectively neutralize that person, and portray them as evil incarnate, while truly they may be righteous instead.

Propaganda can be used effectively if; the listening audience is lacking intelligence, inclined to mob psychology, or under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The human mind can be a fertile receptive field under the right conditions. This is why propaganda is so effective.
A hypothetical for instance! Let’s say you are having a conversation with someone who would use propaganda to their advantage. You mention the fact that this particular person you both know is a fine upstanding person. The propagandist injects this thought, Oh! They’re ok, with the exception of only having one bad habit, they tell lies! You walk away from that conversation with doubt! Your mind has just received propaganda. The truth of the matter you find out later, after you begin to question that statement is; this individual would never lie no matter what! But the effect has caused you to doubt. This is how it works! Propaganda is designed to create doubt. Propaganda can be composed of half truths and half lies such as are currently spewing from the Obama administration. The epithets used by Speaker Pelosi et al are only an example of name calling and stigmatizing propaganda. Next we want to look at glittering generalities.

September 17, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

A Picture’s Meaning Can Express Ten Thousand Words.

83577971JS009_PRESIDENT_ELE
A picture’s meaning can express ten thousand words so goes the Chinese saying. I challenge everyone who views this picture and reads this post to run a comparison between what Bismarck, Hitler and now Obama have done or are doing. See if there is a correlation between the two figures in the picture doctrinally and personality wise! Heil Hitler meant Salvation is of or from Hitler, and Obama also has messiah connotations as well. Coincidence…Hardly!

So many times history is repeated because people just never learned their lessons from past historical events. Or; perhaps they think that was a good idea and it just wasn’t time for it then. Socialized medicine is nothing new. In 1884 Prince Otto von Bismarck, Chancellor of Germany, instituted the first modern program of socialized medicine. It was called compulsory national health insurance. However, Bismarck’s scheme failed miserably to provide better medical care for the people of Germany; but it did become an important feature of the German militaristic state; it helped pave the way for Hitler a generation later. There is the historical lesson that failed to make a lasting impression on future generations.

England first started experimenting with socialized medicine in 1911. The experiments were a failure, as they always have been everywhere. And from the Drudge Report comes this item: “SASKATOON — The incoming president of the Canadian Medical Association says this country’s health-care system is sick and doctors need to develop a plan to cure it.

Dr. Anne Doig says patients are getting less than optimal care and she adds that physicians from across the country – who will gather in Saskatoon on Sunday for their annual meeting – recognize that changes must be made.

“We all agree that the system is imploding, we all agree that things are more precarious than perhaps Canadians realize,” Doing said in an interview with The Canadian Press.” And the Canadians have socialized medicine!

Currently, the United States (?) government has proven to be a failure in just about everything they seize control of. Socialized medicine is just another government intrusion and seizure. This program is destined for failure no matter who or what fights to implement this financial monstrosity!

August 17, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

From the Consent of the Governed!

consent_of_governed
The Declaration of Independence says the following: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

We the people are seemingly no longer the people who place the President, the Senate, Congressmen et al into power. Our voice is seemingly ignored and silenced when we do speak out against actions of our elected officials. Tyrannical governments seek to silence its’ constituents. The ordered liberty concept can be either balanced with excessive liberty not becoming anarchical in concept because of no restraints imposed on the governed or; order can become tyrannical in concept when excessive Rules of Law are imposed in the name of necessity. The scales of balance are tipping towards the tyrannical unbalanced side by the Democratic Party and their controlling positions both in the House and Senate. To make matters worse, if possible, the President is also of the Democratic Party.

Have we the people no say or control of legislations that will ultimately affect us as citizens? Are we the people now at the mercy and under the control of despotic dictatorial leadership? When did America become ensconced with the Gulag mentality of Stalin and Lenin’s Russia of bygone eras? Personally, the current ruling administration and their coterie do not have my consent because they are not anchored in the foundational documents of America the primary one being the Constitution. When tyrannical governmental figures want to seize control of the entire system of government, they will either rewrite or abolish any documentation in opposition to their agenda, either overtly or covertly, with one thought in mind, change the rules of the playing field to suit their agenda. The Communist Rules for Revolution contain the following supposedly written in the early 1900’s.

“Always preach true democracy, but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible. By encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit; produce years of inflation with rising prices and general discontent.” Well, by all means this is taking place before our very eyes (if we are not blind of course) in today’s administration. This current administration are seizing power as quickly as possible and introducing legislation that will make every citizen of the United States of America…a Slave! Everything the forefathers and the succeeding generations have fought and died for becomes mute! Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness will be a thing of the past because of the abject slavery that we are being encumbered with, and not by our consent! The governed never gave those who they placed in power the right to place them into slavery. Or; is it Obama’s et al plan to give Americans a taste of what the black people have gone through all these years? Is there some subversive plan for requital for past injurious inflictions to black people et al?

But; there seems to be a plan a lot larger than retribution and retaliation here. The plan is to turn America into a Communist type nation such as was in the failed (communistic) systems of Europe past. There are definite underpinnings of Stalin, Lenin, Marx in the actions of Obama and his coterie. Community organizer…? Ha! More like Community Revolutionist against anything American. This is all being done without the consent of the governed because posers/wannabees are using double speak language to keep the American people from knowledge of what they are doing…exactly! How about some examples of double speak?

1. Layoff, downsize, rightsize, headcount adjustment, RIF (reduction in force), realignment: mass dismissal of employees, usually due to business restructuring or economic conditions, or just not wanting to pay their benefits package at retirement
2. Public donation, shared sacrifice, public service: taxes, taxes, taxes
3. Job seekers: the unemployed, the laid off, the fired, no longer hirable
4. Asylum seekers: refugees , terrorists, illegal’s
5. Undocumented aliens: (US) illegal aliens
6. Freedom fighter: political rebel, activist, community organizer, revolutionist, Alinsky
7. Euthanasia: killing old people, deleting the useless eaters

As we of Native American (those with genetic inheritances) descent would say, they speak with forked tongue. They say one thing but mean another. The language of Obama and his coterie is masked in double-speak. What are their actual intentions? And do they have the consent of the governed? No, I do not believe they do because of their agenda of ramming their legislation through by threat, coercion and political force, and many times done at night or on weekends when people are sleeping! My, is this the problem..? The people are sleeping? We the people must once again take control and be governed by consent…ours!

July 30, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Moral Relevance!

The Ten Commandments
This should be one of the major considerations for the GOP’s next presidential candidate. The people are tired of dysfunctional families and the political hacks that lead them. Is the GOP seeking the quintessential candidate, or are they just looking for a nice face on top with nothing between the ears but vacuousness (stupidity) where the brain should be? Should the GOP be seeking candidates with sordid pasts and scandal implications as resume requisites? Should the GOP follow the Democrats pattern of acceptance for any immoral and debauchery laden background? The GOP was supposed to be the party of morals and family oriented. The leader presents a party format, as is the leader, so is the party and its’ constituents, well mostly. The Bible talks of the time when Aaron loosed the people, and when he made the golden calf as an idol to be worshipped. The true leader, a strict moralist, was absent from their location, and while he was gone the people were loosed and their moral focus and moral compass was absent from their lives.

If the GOP fields an amoral candidate what will be the outcome? Will the people look upon the candidate’s immoral failings as an example to do the same? Will placing an adulterer or adulteress on the ticket for example, signify approval of this amoral behavior? Will the people think that it’s okay to commit adultery because the candidate did and look where they are, running for the office of president! No, because morals are still important! In his book Common Morality: Deciding What to Do (2004) Bernard Gert proposes ten moral rules which, if followed, create a moral system. The rules are as follows:

1. Do not kill
2. Do not cause pain
3. Do not disable
4. Do not deprive of freedom
5. Do not deprive of pleasure
6. Do not deceive
7. Keep your promises
8. Do not cheat
9. Obey the law
10. Do your duty

If the GOP can field a candidate that follows the Biblical Ten Commandments and can acknowledge Gert’s ten moral rules, they could once again capture the attention of America’s conservative voters. However, if it is business as usual, the GOP offers an amoral candidate with a dysfunctional family that flaunts their immoral actions; you can just stay home or not enter a preference when you are faced with the GOP vs. the Democrat choice for president at the voting booth 2012.

Why should the GOP place these kinds of people and then rub them in the people’s faces as the GOP choice (S) like it or not? Do you honestly think we want a morally used (amoral) or spent candidate? Do you honestly think that everyone is committing adultery or debauchery so it’s okay to run a candidate that did or still does? What is the problem with this picture, and why does the political wannabees continue to want center stage when they can’t even qualify for the office of dog catcher where they reside? We are being bombarded by a has been beauty queen that attended five different colleges in a six year span of time, with less than two semesters at most, she finally received a B.S. in communications with an emphasis in journalism from the University of Idaho. By every university standard offering this degree curriculum this degree should be easier to achieve in less time than that. However, what you have is a former beauty queen that can talk/communicate, a vacuous yakking beauty queen at that! And her college GPA is suggested to be fairly low, and that was obvious during her first speaking attempts. So, what is your point on that?

My point can be understood if one were to use the right head to seriously evaluate the person from a requirement point of view. Why can’t the GOP find an intelligent accomplished woman to run for the office of president, shall we say someone like Condoleeza Rice for example? Why can’t the GOP find a well educated woman to place on the ballot? I’ll tell you why, because the qualified (and emphasis on qualified) women are not face or body beautiful and they just don’t look good in a bathing suit. The GOP would rather field a former beauty queen that looks good in PR photos and a bathing suit. Regardless that this individual is the atypical vacuous beauty queen that rides the wave on looks without the necessary mental capacity or capabilities to run this country. GOP, if you are reading this…what are you thinking? Do you seriously think that you can place anyone this fatuous in serious contention? You think it was bad when she was selected for McCain’s running mate, just wait until the next time (should she be stupid enough to run) when the Democratic hit machine gets up and running, they will devour her in short order.

What America needs is candidates that do not and have not committed adultery or any other sexual immorality. America needs candidates who do not do drugs or drink alcohol excessively and whose family members don’t either. America needs candidates that do not have children who participate in sexual activity without being married and bring forth children out of wedlock. America needs candidates that live above the foul morass of the amorality in the Democrat Party and those who are devoid of any values whatsoever. America needs candidates they can look up to, not candidates they can compare themselves to, and then say, at least I’m better than they are, while they continue practicing abominable behavior because of the provided bad examples by the GOP et al parties. The pattern (s) of America’s leaders should be above reproach! America needs moral relevance not immoral insignificance.

July 22, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | , , , | No Comments Yet

Another Political Party?

breakup
Has America had enough? Is it time for change in our government and political parties? The Democratic Party is changing America into another form of Communism such as Socialism. The GOP Republican Party is becoming obfuscated on identity and purpose. So what is the best choice for America? What does America and its’ constituents want or desire? Do Americans still want freedoms as guaranteed by the foundational documents of America? Does America still want family values and morals? If we answer yes to these questions, can the political parties now extant provide these basic necessities to remain a free and independent democracy? The answer to that is no! No, these parties are basically the same in practice and the lines between them is merging daily.
So, what is the answer? What does the Constitution say? What does the Declaration of Independence say? The later document sets the tone for the current political parties and the current governments disobliges. There comes a time for change, and if the political parties can no longer listen to “We the People” then it is time to implement the following taken from the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.”

The time has now come to alter and or abolish the current political parties as they no longer serve their constituents and the government of these United States of America. This form of government now instituted at the inauguration of President Obama has become destructive to these ends as framed in the Declaration and the Constitution. The Constitution is not a document that was implemented to be abolished or open to radical interpretation according to any person or party ideology. “When the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?” The changes that need attention are not by any means trivial or light. The safety and well being of true Americans are now in question. The financial security, prosperity and free market enterprise are becoming past tense. When life savings can be taken away from workers and investors, and when a company/government no longer wants to pay them (the workers) their hard earned benefits, which they legitimately earned, the financial security no longer exists. When a government declares war on successful financially responsible people, they lose their safety and future security.

When the government and political parties no longer derive their power from the consent of the governed, and when they become tyrants along the same line as/of the King of England…! A classic example can be seen in the escalating taxes, monetary mismanagement, and budget deficits that cannot be understood or even comprehended, it is time for the people to take the power away from these despots, these political hacks that only seek their own welfare at the expense of the people. The time has come to institute a new party of the people, by the people and for the people. This party must be constituted of dedicated conservative men and women having the welfare of this country and its people as their primary focus and agenda. The leadership must be above reproach with a high moral compass. The GOP (quasi) was supposed to be the party of family values, morals; however, they have fallen from their lofty status and have become the party of failure along these lines. People putting themselves forward in the GOP are tainted by their adulterous indiscretions and weaknesses of the flesh. The leading candidates for the next presidential race should not even be spouting their agenda on any media outreach or forum.

Let me make myself perfectly clear on this because the people in contention for the next presidential race should not even be seriously considered. People like the adulterous Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Sarah Palin, et al must be rejected as viable candidates because of their willful indiscretions. If America elects these kinds of people to any office anywhere, they are taking a step backwards and the morals of America will decline even further. Can anyone of a high moral character look up to these kinds of people for an example of what one should become or be? Absolutely not! It is time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their country. Oh, do you think I have become too pontificating and condescending with these requirements for elective office? Yes, all have sinned and fallen short, and there is forgiveness for sins, and the people who commit sin deserve another opportunity to make good. However, there are so many people just like King David that must have the sin and or confession of such dug out of them! They will not disclose their sins willingly, but, they have to be caught red handed and exposed in order to stop or even confess their trysts. Yes, people can repent! Yes people can pay for their sins and crimes, as this happens all the time. But, should some of these kinds of people be considered for the office of the President of the United States of America? Remember Bill Clinton? Now is that a good example for children to follow? Remember Spitzer, Vitter, Ensign, Sanford, Craig et al, to name a few? I rest my case. There will be more on this!

July 7, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | 1 Comment

Unpatriotic Capitalists!

American-Made-In-China
One of the worst atrocities perpetrated upon the American people are the unpatriotic acts/actions of the 20th and 21st century capitalists. Perhaps one would think that this is a rather harsh assessment? Perhaps a little truth shock is needed to see the real intentions of the capitalists and their design for America and its’ people. The capitalists are not patriotic as can be seen in their business dealings, the evacuation of their businesses from American shores, and then reestablishing them in foreign countries. When we were given a free land because our forefathers could no longer deal with the tyranny and oppression of their former European et al countries, they came to the shores of a country now called America. Their departure from the virtual slavery/subjugation imposed on them via oppressive laws, taxations, and the absence of the right to protest these oppressing burdens, eventually brought upon them a war that they did not seek. The Revolutionary War was fought for freedom; freedom from the oppression of England’s overbearing control and excessive subjugation of the new colonies in America. Forthrightly; the people wanted to be free from England and free from many other countries that continuously oppressed their people.

Capitalism’s fundamental reason for existence is to create or make wealth with an initial investment. The profits usually went to one person while the burden of creating that wealth was the result of many workers labor which was capitalized on with small wages for services rendered. Supposedly, the capitalist took the initial risk by their financial investment so; they were the primary beneficiaries of this investment. Nothing has changed since the onset of the capitalist agenda…perhaps noble (?) at first but more mercenary in today’s avaricious corporate structures. The bottom line is all that counts…no matter what or who. Capitalists want to make money at the expense of their workers. They are not willing to share their profit except it be in the form of yearend bonuses that really only serve to quiet the workers and make them continue to produce for their company. This minuscule token is really nowhere near what the worker (s) does for this company in work and benefits. Many workers are very skilled at their position and the corporate structure realizes more in worker return than in their token gifts, wages, and small benefit packages that they bestow upon the workers overall.

The real problem occurring over the past few decades can be seen in capitalism’s true intentions. If one were to consider themselves to be patriotic, would they support America’s workforce? Would one support this wonderful country for the blessings received? Being born in a free land with more than ample opportunities to become successful, if that’s what you want, can be achieved in America. However, along with these advantages come responsibilities. The responsibilities to remain Americans with the good of the country and its people should be a primary consideration…wouldn’t you think? Then why is it that the capitalists are now evacuating the shores of America and taking their businesses to foreign countries? Why are these same capitalists taking our goods offshore to be manufactured by people in a foreign country? Are these people/capitalists patriotic in any sense of the word or definition? No; absolutely not! These people are unpatriotic traitors of the lowest level. No longer content to exploit America’s work force, they now go to foreign countries to exploit the people there! Why pay $15.00 an hour when you can pay $2.00 an hour (or less) for work performed. And, no benefit packages are necessary in foreign countries!

The capitalist cannot share their fortunes with the people that actually made this fortune for them and their company. What does it take to place a little money into a quasi capitalist adventure? There is not too much blood, sweat and tears at this level. The real producers at the worker level are the ones that actually make the money for their respective companies of employment when all things are considered! The corporate leaders can only take the bow and the profit from the labor of others. These parasitic unpatriotic people at the corporate head should be ashamed of themselves for not supporting the land (America) into which they were born and the people that live and try to make a living here. The jobless rate continues to escalate! The benefit packages of the workers who invested their entire working life in the company they worked for are now gone or disappearing! And this could have been prevented by placing America and its people first and the profit line after.

Where is all this headed? Does anyone believe in the Bible and its prophecies, predictions today? Well if you do, there will be vengeance and havoc wreaked upon all of these capitalists who took advantage of the poor working force of America, and all those who put into place and practice these same exploitative agendas in foreign countries. Let’s read a couple of things concerning this and then we will wait for the other shoe to fall on these avaricious unpatriotic people! “What mean you that you crush my people, and grind the face of the poor says the Sovereign Yahweh of hosts?” Isaiah 3:15 “Come now, you rich, weep and howl for your miseries that are coming upon you. Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold and your silver are rusted; and their rust shall be for a testimony against you, and shall eat your flesh as fire. You have laid up your treasure in the last days. Behold the hire of the laborers who mowed your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, cries out: and the cries of them that reaped have entered into the ears of Yahweh of Hosts. James 5:1-4

Yes, these unpatriotic capitalist raiders do crush the people; they place heavy burdens as in the days of Egypt, make bricks without straw. Pay your mortgages and car payments without any jobs because they have been taken to foreign countries. Make your living without a decent wage while the prices continue to escalate such as ascending gas prices in the midst of a gas glut and oil surplus. Yes, they keep back the wages while their bottom line continues to increase. They always want you to believe they are not making money but they continue to operate don’t they? Yes, many companies are going under and do you think this is a coincidence after reading the aforementioned Biblical passages? Not hardly! Yes fellow patriotic Americans as they say…” paybacks are hell!” And behold…it comes!

May 26, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | , , | No Comments Yet

The Two Faces of Pelosi!

two faces of pelosi
“…When generating a lie or a false response, one must know the truth, resist the impulse to answer truthfully, and further generate an alternative but appropriate response.” – J.M. Nuñez et. al.

Is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi a pathological liar? Does she have dissociative identity disorder (DID)? Or…is she just plain schizophrenic? Which Pelosi is it that speaks on any given day? What did she know and when did she know it?

Dissociative Identity Disorder (Multiple Personality Disorder)

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) is a severe condition in which two or more distinct identities, or personality states, are present in—and alternately take control of—an individual. The person also experiences memory loss that is too extensive to be explained by ordinary forgetfulness. Considering the verbal fluctuations in Pelosi’s present stand on the torture techniques of the CIA and being briefed on this in 2002. Pelosi was briefed by the CIA in 2002 along with three additional congressional leaders, where Pelosi was informed of enhanced interrogation techniques, and was told that White House lawyers concluded that waterboarding was legal. Does Pelosi have selective/convenient amnesia? What is selective/convenient amnesia?

Selective/convenient amnesia – amnesia about particular events that is very convenient for the person who cannot remember. Why do some politicians always develop selective amnesia when questioned about their transgressions? Is Pelosi lying? Are her lips moving? It does appear that she is sidestepping and dancing around the real truth of the matter. Gail Satz talked recently with Katie Couric about why people lie. Here is some of what she said.

“Everybody lies. It may only be “white” lies, but everyone tells lies or “omits the truth” sometimes. We start lying at around age 4 to 5 when children gain an awareness of the use and power of language. This first lying is not malicious, but rather to find out, or test, what can be manipulated in a child’s environment. Eventually children begin to use lying to get out of trouble or get something they want. White lies, those concocted to protect someone’s feelings, are not a big deal at all. The person, however, who seems to feel compelled to lie about both the small and large stuff has a problem. We often call these folks pathological liars (which is a description, not a diagnosis). They lie to protect themselves, look good, gain financially or socially and avoid punishment. Quite often the person who has been deceived knows that this type of liar has to a certain extent deluded him or herself and is therefore to be somewhat pitied. A much more troubling group is those who lie a lot — and knowingly — for personal gain. These people may have a diagnosis called antisocial personality disorder, also known as being a sociopath” (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4072816/).

Is Nancy Pelosi regressing to her childhood wherein she probably began lying? It would appear that she is exhibiting the same traits of a 4 or 5 year old child who lies to keep from getting into trouble. Why Nancy do you think you would be taken to the woodshed if you were caught lying? Pathological lying has been compared with the “pseudolying” observed in children. Despite their obvious comparability, it is important to draw a distinction between the “fantasy” lying observed in children and pathological lying. Children’s use of fantasy to deny reality is said to be an important aspect of self-development and self-protection, but when this persists into adulthood, it becomes pathological. It has been proposed that the pathological liar’s ego is fixated at the childhood level (DSM-IV). Pathological is defined as; of, relating to, or manifesting behavior that is habitual, maladaptive, and compulsive. Or is Pelosi just plain schizophrenic? Is there two Nancy Pelosi’s? One that concurs with the majority on certain issues but then shifts and changes her mind when she is called into question by the lunatic fringe?

For the record…do I believe in torture? Should we take extreme measures when America is under attack by enemies foreign or domestic? There should be a contingency clause in any method of interrogation wherein masses of lives are in jeopardy by possible bomb annihilation. There are times when the situation warrants the use of interrogations beyond normal atypical question and answer sessions that seek a confession of guilt. Sometimes the use of truth serum should be implemented. Would that be too extreme for those in opposition to torture of any kind? Probably! Remember, some (perhaps many or most) of those in opposition to torture were against spanking children and you can see where that has taken us in America? Is Pelosi lying? Yes! She should fess-up and tell the truth with a so-what attitude concerning her critics and left of sane opposition. Truth will always stand on its’ own merits! Personally…I’m a Jack Bauer fan…so you know where I’m coming from on this quasi torture issue!

May 15, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | , , | No Comments Yet

Living In/With Fear!

propagandanazistabsbible
“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself–nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance” Franklin Delano Roosevelt, First Inaugural Address, Mar. 4, 1933, sage advice from one of the leading proponents of the Democratic Party. Why the mass hysteria and fear in the Democratic Party? You say what fear, what hysteria? Take a close look at the agenda of the Democratic Party now in power. Why would there be a need to pass legislation that implements a federal “hate crimes” plan? H.R. 1913 focuses on stopping certain agendas not in agreement with the Socialist/Fascist Left now in power. This legislation will be target specific. This legislation will be directed to anyone that speaks or writes about homosexuality in a negative way that would condemn the practice called “abomination” in Leviticus 18:22 and “reprobate mind” in Romans 1:27-28. The plain truth of this matter is the homosexual community just doesn’t want to hear this type of condemning dialog. They do not want to be told that their behavior is evil and unacceptable. So they will do everything possible to avoid the label and stigma of their inordinate lifestyle.

In seeking extra protection the homosexual seeks to forestall eradication or persecution. The homosexual community has tried everything to make their abhorrent lifestyle acceptable to the human race. They had the APA change their definition and designation. They had the stigmatizing term GRID (Gay-related immune deficiency) changed to a more acceptable acronym AIDS (Acquired immune deficiency syndrome). This illusion was to avoid any direct connection of origin concerning this terrible disease that infected homosexuals. They also had the laws changed regarding the illegality of sodomy and now because of the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court Lawrence v. Texas decision this behavior was taken into the legal forced compliance arena that now affords them (homosexuals) safety when they conduct their sexual liaisons. Systematically the forced changes have degraded and denigrated the institution of marriage between one man and one woman. And all of this is because they fear being eradicated for their behavior. If according to them that this is acceptable behavior why all of the deceit and treacherous activity to protect themselves? They are living in and with fear, and well they should be! If history is any reference/indicator to this behavior, they will be wiped out in due time.

Another fear of the Socialist Fascist Left is an overthrow of their government. They want to stop the freedom of speech of Ministers and Talk Show Hosts that speak in opposition to their agenda. So, now they want to censor talk radio and this will include religious preachers that speak the real truth concerning plans for their totalitarian regime. This agenda is no different than Rome, Germany, and now the United States and eventually all countries of the world that will be brought under their governmental power. First they must shut up the opposition so they will implement media censorship that will include radio, newspapers, Internet news and blog sites et al. The First Amendment rights will be reinterpreted to mean other things such as the yelling of fire in a theatre will now be applied abstractly instead of literally. It will acquire a new intension that now means something entirely different. Instead of yelling fire (in a theatre) the new interpretation will be any oral presentation (s) that contain their idea of what hate speech now is, will be unacceptable. Well…sort of, because, the First Amendment has already been stretched to cover indecorous practices already. How can we interpret free speech as allowing the possession and viewing of pornography, nude art, and scatological presentations? Anyway, this is another fear that the left of the sane line lives with.

Another problem for true patriotic Americans will be the forced compliance of their gun law legislation. Perhaps they will create another crisis such as 911 to implement a gun seizure plan. This is not new in governments that will do anything to stay in power. Hitler used the same tactic and method to reduce or eliminate the possibility of being overthrown. “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.” –Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426.

You think this can’t happen, well you are sadly mistaken. Remember it was University intelligence and intelligent people that supported Hitler. Big business supported and financed Hitler. Propaganda was used for Hitler’s position acceleration and establishment. Propaganda was used against Hitler’s enemies. This current administration is engaging in a constant propaganda diatribe. So, in all actuality, there is nothing new under the sun. And, they are promulgating once again the Fascist/Socialist agenda of Hitler’s bygone and dead era!

April 30, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Another JANET??? Another Waco?

hitler-napolitano
Well, America must suffer under another Janet, as if Janet Reno wasn’t enough! It would appear that the left of the sane line such as socialists, fascists, and liberals in general, are targeting anything to the right of the sane line. One needs to remember just who and what these people represent. Fascists were in vogue during the early part of the twentieth century. Two despot leaders that rose during this era with socialistic and fascist agendas were Hitler and Mussolini. Similarly, Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party adapted fascism to Germany beginning in 1933, said:

“The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property.” (Barkai 1990, pp. 26–27) Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

“The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill.” (p. 280) So, where is America now headed? The socialists and fascists are now in power and the two shall become as one for the good of their cause and party. However, there are some inconvenient stumbling blocks that these left of the sane line must overcome. One is to gain control and remotion of all guns either by complete eradication and seizure or, have them locked up for use on specific occasions like hunting or target shooting, can we say England’s gun control methods here? By creating a quasi need for gun control (euphemism for complete seizure) the socialist/fascist party now in power will create the opportunity for this occurrence. Think Hitler here and here is a reminder of how that went down during his reign.

“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.” –Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426.

Janet Napolitano’s mindless diatribe concerning “Extremists” is only a portend for what lies ahead. When you verbally indict our military veterans current or past, and then stigmatize them with the extremist’s appellative/appellation, you are labeling them in the same way the Hitler did during his lunatic tenure as leader of Germany. Why is Napolitano concerned over the military aspect and labeling them as extremists? No rocket science needed here to answer that one. She is acting on behalf of the scared and threatened party she now is goose stepping to/for. Their problem (socialists/fascists) is getting into power and then keeping that power no matter what. They are afraid that their regime will be toppled and who better than trained military personnel to accomplish something like that? Hitler worried about being overthrown as aforementioned in his own words.

It appears that Napolitano is putting into effect the agenda of the less than sane liberal left. What distraction will she create to impose their absolute control agendas? Will she find another Waco to burn to the ground? Will she invade the homes of private citizens and seize their guns? What about militia groups that she perceives as a threat, how will she justify her aggressive “extremist” delusions about them really wanting to take over America so we just had to stop them? Or…will she actually have the government agencies blow up another Murrah Building after she orders some “extremist” stronghold burnt to the ground just like the other Janet (Reno) did at Waco, Texas? It appears that the name Janet has a common mental denominator here. And for America and its’ people that is not good! Personally, they should get Janet Napolitano out of this office before she sets America on fire, not only with words but with Gestapo orchestrated manifestations. Maybe she will even have the audacity to attack Chuck Norris and label him as an “extremist,” want to wish you well on that one Janet!

April 22, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Supercilious Sarah?

“Though Yahweh is high, yet He looks upon the lowly; but the proud He knows from afar.” Psalm 138:6

The Palin-Gibson interview brought forth scripted responses generated and written by GOP wordsmiths. Are these answers the true thoughts of Sarah Palin, or are these canned responses? One of the problems that can be found in Palin’s answers is superciliousness. What does this mean? Simply put, she was haughty in her responses to Gibson’s questions. I did not watch her interview but read the Q&A on Powerlineblog Dot Com. The question and subsequent answer that troubled me was this:

“GIBSON: Governor, let me start by asking you a question that I asked John McCain about you. And it is really the central question. Can you look the country in the eye and say, I have the experience, and I have the ability to be not just vice president, but perhaps president of the United States of America?

PALIN: I do, Charlie, and on January 20th, when John McCain and I are sworn in, if we are so privileged to be elected to serve this country, we’ll be ready. I’m ready.”

Taking a quantum verbal leap from being ready to serve in a Vice-Presidential capacity to being ready to assume the office of the President is what is called superciliousness. Whatever makes her think that she is qualified for either position? It appears that preparations are being made by the GOP et al for the demise of John McCain given his age and possible health problems. And, the same can be said about their rivals. If by extension Joe Biden withdraws from the race and is replaced by Hillary Clinton, Obama must then wonder about his possible demise. Politics is a very dirty business; it’s all about power and achieving it no matter the cost. Back to Palin! One of the major problems that can be found in Palin being selected as McCain’s VP choice is her inexperience and fiscal ineptitude.

Palin was the Mayor of Wasilla, Alaska and when she left that position she left Wasilla approximately $20 million of debt, and that is a lot of money for a city with about 6,300 inhabitants during her tenure as Mayor. Being one for the facts first and then the decision based on facts, one can hardly assume Palin is qualified based on her record as Mayor and then Governor of Alaska. What are the statistics where budget and debt are concerned? Now the question arises concerning believability, who will you believe Palin, or actual published reports? The troubling statistics reported by The Daily Kos are yet to be answered satisfactorily as the GOP and Palin continue their fiscal irresponsibility dance, and serve Kool-Aid to all that attend their ambiguous meetings. Palin should fit right in as the Republican Party are the most financially irresponsible party between the two. Bush 2 will leave us with a record budget deficit of over 480 Billion dollars. The public debt clock is at 9.6 Trillion dollars and counting. By the time Bush 2 leaves office it will certainly exceed 9.7 plus Trillion dollars. Palin is continuing the GOP fiscal irresponsibility policy. Anyway, the facts about Palin’s true fiscal responsibilities as Mayor of Wasilla, Alaska.

“Debt Service Increased 69 Percent Under Palin. In fiscal 2003 — the last fiscal year Palin approved the budget — the total government debt service was $658,662. In fiscal 1996—the year before Palin took control of the budget — the debt service was $390,385. The increase was 69 percent. [Wasilla Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2003, Table 1]

Palin Left Behind Almost $19 Million In Long-Term Debt, Compared to None Before She Was Mayor. In fiscal 2003 — the last fiscal year Palin approved the budget — the bonded long-term debt was $18,635,000. In fiscal 1996—the year before Palin took control of the budget—there was no general obligation debt. [Wasilla Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2003, Table 10]

Long-Term Debt Was $3000 Per Capita When Palin Left, Compared to None Before She Was Mayor. In fiscal 2003 — the last fiscal year Palin approved the budget—the bonded long-term debt per capita was $2,938. In fiscal 1996 — the year before Palin took control of the budget—there was no general obligation debt. [Wasilla Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2003, Table 10]

When Palin Left Office, 6.24% of Government Spending Was On Debt Service, Compared to None Before She Was Mayor. In fiscal 2003—the last fiscal year Palin approved the budget—the ratio of debt service to general government expenditures was 6.24 percent. There was no long-term debt before she took office. [Wasilla Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2003, Table 11]

Palin Signed Ordinance to Issue $15 Million in General Obligation Bonds and Increase the Sales Tax From 2 to 2.5 Percent. In 2001, Palin signed an ordinance authorizing the city to issue general obligation bonds in the principal amount of $14,700,000 to finance the acquisition and construction of park and recreation capital improvements. The ordinance also increased the sales tax from 2 to 2.5 percent and put the issue on the ballot. After it was adopted by voters, Palin signed an ordinance issuing the bonds. In 2002, Palin signed an ordinance putting the higher sales tax into effect. [Ordinance 01-55 (am), 12/10/2001; Ordinance 02-14 (sub), 4/8/2002; Ordinance 02-49, 8/12/2002]

Palin Was Accused By Stein of Overspending By Approving $5.5 Million Bond; She Replied that It Had Been Approved By Voters. “Now Stein is urging voters to turn the tables again. He’s accused Palin of overspending city money and has been particularly critical of a $ 5.5 million road and sewer bond passed last year by voters. He says the bond payments could make the city vulnerable should the economy turn down. Palin notes residents approved the bond, which she says was needed for critical road work.” [Anchorage Daily News (Alaska), 10/5/99]

Palin Said the Reason for the Increased Cost of Government Was Interest on Bonds. “‘‘Sarah rode in on a conservative horse, but the actual cost of government has gone up,’’ he said. But Palin says most of the increase is due to the $ 400,000 in interest owed on the road and sewer bonds, a measure she notes the voters approved. Much of the rest is due to some positions now included in her budget that weren’t when she first took over, she said. Stein also criticized the $ 5.5 million bond package, which he said will cost too much to pay off and could make the city vulnerable should the economy turn down.” [Anchorage Daily News (Alaska), 9/20/99]”

The only catch was that the city began building roads and installing utilities for the project before it had unchallenged title to the land. The misstep led to years of litigation and at least $1.3 million in extra costs for a small municipality with a small budget. What was to be Ms. Palin’s legacy has turned into a financial mess that continues to plague Wasilla…
(http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/
9/6/175447/3823/493/589385)

Lucy, you’ve got some splaning to do! Sarah skirts these deficit issues by blaming the voters. She says they approved these financial measures. Sarah! You ride a conservative horse and approve more debt? You can’t have it both ways Sarah! If you went by the facts on Palin’s fiscal capabilities, you must ascertain that Palin is inept in this department. But, on the other hand you could say that these published reports are nothing but lies and these facts are only generated to smear Sarah Palin! Keep drinking that Kool-Aid GOP supporter; one and all. If truth doesn’t fit the Palin profile, change it to make it fit your preconceived fallacious perception of Saint Sarah. On the one hand people (the GOP) are making the stigmatizing appellation that Obama is a “Messiah” type figure, while their view of Palin comparatively speaking is saintly, the Alaska Governor is a Saint sent to preserve the GOP and their expensive spendthrift ways. So, in summation:

• Palin is not a very humble person.
• Palin is fiscally irresponsible.
• Palin is not truthful.
• Palin like most politicians, practices deceit for her own grandiose plans.
• Palin is not qualified for the office of VP or (Heaven forbid) the office of President.

On the other hand, the Democrat Party will most likely raise taxes if elected. However, noticeably, the Democrats are actually more fiscally responsible than the Republicans! The statistics verify this truth. This year the best thing will probably be to follow Joseph Farah’s (World Net Daily) advise; “none of the above.”

“Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” Proverbs 16:18

September 12, 2008 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | , , , , | No Comments Yet

To Alter or To Abolish…?


What is occurring in America’s governmental system today is not what the architects of the Declaration of Independence had in mind. After reading Chuck Norris’s column in World Net Daily, I must concur with the object and scope of his column. However, I would take his concept of “The Coming Revolution” one step farther. When we read what the framers of America had in mind based on previous experience with tyrannical governments, we can truly understand their concept of freedom; freedom that was given not by man, but endowed by the Creator on the entire human race. What these brave men and women fought for is now being discarded by egotistical government officials propelled by avarice and their desire for absolute power. Power that will perpetrate on the peoples severe bondage, physical and financial! These incalcitrant individuals reject the concepts delineated in the Declaration of Independence and subsequently, the Constitution! We need to read a section of the Declaration to comprehend fully their (the framers of these foundational documents) direction and reasons for inclusion.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, – That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” (Declaration of Independence)

When we analyze this paragraph in the light of today’s government misconduct, it becomes more apparent that change must come albeit revolution or abolishment, this current government must be changed. Some type of revolution must be seriously considered. The framers knew their lives were unvalued before entering the new colony. They knew the severe bondage that they suffered while living under the regime of ruthless despotic kings. And they knew the sorrow of religious oppression that accompanied them every day of their life prior to their exodus. They considered their former estate and determined not to allow this evil to come upon them in the new colony, their new free world. And, while it lasted, it was very good for the new colonists. Nevertheless, there arose a Pharaoh that knew not Joseph, casting aside religious values! America’s peoples are the descendants of Joseph; the Bible is our true textbook. The new colonists knew the Bible, and believed in it. The words of the Most High adorn many documents and speeches given by these brave people. They were willing to give everything, including their lives, in order to remain free from any form of tyrannical government.

Well! Have we come full circle? Has this current government forgotten the rights of the governed? Have we been forced to accept the leaders’ rulership as absolute and dictatorial in concept? When did we relinquish the rights of the “consent of the governed?” It is “We the People” that are supposedly consigned the rights to set these leaders’ into their positions of rulership, according to this document. When the governed are supplanted by the governing, and the people no longer have the powers inscribed in the founding documentation, we have been constrained to another dictatorship from which our ancestors fled. Do we need another King of England? Do we need another Stalin, Lenin, or Hitler? This is exactly what happens when the checks and balances are disturbed and disrupted by narcissistic representatives. When the foundational documentation remains inviolable, the nation under which it was written cannot be easily destroyed. However, when these documents along with the major source of reference, the Bible, are breached, destruction is at hand!

I cannot concur with Mr. Norris’s selections politically speaking of course. And this is my right to agree or disagree. Huckabee, Mr. Norris’ choice for presidential candidate in my opinion is inadequate. However, he is by far the better choice than McCain. Also, Romney supersedes McCain by a wide margin. Mr. Norris also considers Sarah Palin a “maverette” politically speaking. However, Mr. Norris needs to do his homework and take a closer look at this one. I have written about her fiscal irresponsibility previously. She just doesn’t pass muster! Her popularity among some is contingent on which head the males see her with! We can certainly do better than McCain and Palin as GOP candidates. And, this is one of the major reasons Americans needs to alter or completely abolish this current government. We are over 480 Billion dollars in budget deficit. We are closing in on 9.7 Trillion dollars as America’s National Debt. The fiscal irresponsibility of President Bush (2), Congress, Senate and the governors of America’s fifty states is beyond alarming. We are being destroyed by these leaders and what pray tell is being done, talk without action? This is where talk show hosts like Limbaugh are a joke! He touts the economy as being good while in TRUTH Limbaugh, it is crashing! Wake up and pull your head out of the sand! Maybe Chuck Norris can generate a head of steam and get something accomplished. Just view these politicians as opponents in a fight Mr. Norris, and take no prisoners. You cannot have respect of persons to accomplish what you are trying to do! We face two choices, either alter or abolish this current governmental system. I am for the latter!

September 15, 2008 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | , , | No Comments Yet

Palin’s Mendacious Executive Experience!

So many individuals that pump up their resume to seem better qualified than they actually are, can usually be found in academic circles, but now we have an example in the presidential race, Palin. Inflated curriculum vitae are the nemesis among College Professors, especially when discovered, as is plagiarism among their students. Plagiarism is cause for immediate suspension for students from the better colleges. College Professors can dance around this mendacity if they have tenure or an enabling college Dean. Also, this amplified qualification of job experience (s) can be seen in job application resumes. And because this is so extant, many companies perform an entire background check for verification of applicant statements on their resumes. In some circles this is known as vetting or examining carefully the person’s entire life. Someone failed to completely vet Sarah Palin before she was nominated for the McCain VP selection.

In a closer examination of a gross exaggeration of Palin’s foreign policy experience, Palin led listeners to believe a prevarication concerning her actual experience and duties as Governor of Alaska. The following was reported in the news after her interview with Katie Couric.

NORAD: Sarah Palin has no role in guarding U.S. airspace despite claims in Katie Couric interview
BY JAMES GORDON MEEK
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU

Tuesday, September 30th 2008, 5:21 PM
WASHINGTON – When Russian bombers approach American airspace and U.S. Air Force fighters are scrambled, Sarah Palin’s phone doesn’t ring.

The Alaska governor has no command authority over the guardians of U.S. airspace despite her recent suggestion otherwise.

“She doesn’t have any role in that process,” Air Force Maj. Allen Herritage, spokesman for the Alaska North American Aerospace Defense Command, told the Daily News.
“The authority to launch and respond to a Russian incursion lies with the Alaska NORAD Region commander” – Air Force Lt. Gen. Dana Atkins, he said.

Palin said last week that her foreign policy experience includes facing the Russians.

“It’s very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia, as Putin rears his head and comes into the airspace of the United States of America – where do they go? It’s Alaska,” Palin told CBS’ Katie Couric.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/09/30/2008-09-30_norad_sarah_palin_has_no_role_in_guardin.html

So, why is the media giving little miss falsehood a pass on this? Why was this overlooked in the vetting process? Maybe she wasn’t completely vetted! Maybe she is in all reality unqualified for this VP selection! This is only one of many mendacities committed by Sarah Palin et al. There seems to be a plethora of willing accomplices to enable this poser. Other things that have come to light while others perform the vetting process that should have been accomplished pre-Palin selection are turning up some startling things. The GOP parades itself as a conservative moral party. They seek the endorsement of the Evangelicals every election cycle. The religious right wants a good morally clean candidate that they can endorse and be conscience free concerning their choice. However, is Palin that choice? Is McCain that choice? They are if you don’t mind an adulterous behavior pattern displayed by both candidates and confessed by one, McCain. Palin has yet to pony up on her adulterous relationship with Brad Hanson. Investigative reporters doing the job that McCain’s vetters should have, revealed plenty about this Alaska first family.

Uncovered in this family were several things that seriously challenge the decision for VP candidate selection. Because this is the GOP (quasi) the disturbing family revelations includes serious drug use (cocaine, marijuana, OxyContin) and abuse by the Palin’s older children Track and Bristol. Sexual promiscuity of the daughter Bristol and the oldest son Track leading to the pregnancy of the unwed daughter Bristol. However, as the Palin’s lead by example their dysfunctional family; consider for a moment the consequences of her being in the office of the VP? Is the GOP serious about this tainted selection? Why did it take a team of investigative reporters to track down and reveal this family for what they really are-dysfunctional? Incidentally, one of the witnesses that testified concerning Sarah Palin’s adulterous relationship with her husband’s business partner passed a lie detector test, and another witness provided a sworn affidavit attesting to the Palin-Hanson story! And, this is the same group of people that ran the John Edward’s adulterous affair to the ground and forced Edwards to confess to his affair with someone outside of his marriage! And you want this kind of flawed unlawful person as your VP? What are you thinking?

So it boils down to this! If you want mendacity as your guideline and example for your children and grandchildren, vote the GOP ticket. However, this years Democratic candidates have not engaged in any known (and they checked) sexual liaisons or inordinate behaviors. However, they are the liberal party so you know their politics. But; that doesn’t seem to matter this year as the GOP has now adopted the Karl Marx social doctrine and solution for the financial catastrophe the country is currently in. Your choices are…not so good this election cycle. Maybe none of the above would be the best choice! And if there is no merit to the Palin-Hanson affair, why did Palin’s husband dissolve their business relationship and become estranged from his former business partner? In criminology this would be considered suspicious behavior and a follow-up would be conducted by investigators to arrive at the truth. So, where are the investigators, the truth seekers? Are you afraid to seriously vet McCain and Palin, or are you content to drink that GOP Kool-Aid? Pity the fool as Mr. T used to say!

October 3, 2008 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll, Uncategorized | , , , | No Comments Yet

Holding Hands and Singing KumbaYah!


Well; the GOP are serving Kool-Aid with their excrement sandwiches these days. The country is going down the proverbial tube while these ignoramuses completely ignore this calamity. Being content to avoid the true issues at hand they are now throwing dirt instead of facing the real problems in America. Every conservative (quasi) web site that I visit offers the latest mud sandwich for their bylines. What should be the real story displayed on these news sites? Shouldn’t there be a concerted effort to change or solve the financial problems facing America and the world? Shouldn’t there be some concerted effort to get the government back into the Constitutional framework it was designed in? It seems that these issues are irrelevant and dirt throwing is of primary importance instead. While this country is being destroyed before our eyes the most important thing to these media provocateurs is dirty politics.

The GOP fielded two loser candidates for their selections. These two are bottom of the barrel selections all things considered. What is their actual stand on the issues at hand and how would they deal with the problems facing America? Do they still believe the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is relevant for our time? Where would they govern from and what would be their plan for America? On one side of this political campaign a truth is spoken and on the other side it is called a lie! Where is the proof of the lie (s)? On one side you know the candidates are liberals, while on the other side you are not sure where they stand, but you do know this, they are not conservatives. So, the GOP ostentates the candidates as the conservative choices for America, all the while knowing this is in all reality, untrue. These two are to the left of Moderate which is now the GOP propensities so it seems. The GOP is now moderate to semi-liberal. Actually the whole government is going (perhaps already there) in the direction of Karl Marx and his socialism framework for government. The big “Bail Out” seals the ideology and implementation of Marxism completely.

The issues at hand are not the issues at hand. When I look at the GOP field many things comes to mind, mostly from my religious background and current Biblical beliefs. On Palin; Proverbs 30:20 “So is the way of an adulterous woman: she eats, and wipes her mouth, and says, I have done no evil.” Proverbs 6:13 ‘That winks with his eyes…That makes signs with his fingers.” Palin is an adulterous woman who thinks that she has done nothing evil, who winks with the eye, and makes signs with the fingers. Did you watch her body language at any time? Did you see her on the debate? Did you see the follow-up picture in the news the next day? There she was winking and pointing that finger! Need I say more? Do you know what you are looking at? And the real problem with this poser is the haunting question; “Are You Smarter than a Fifth Grader?” And the resounding answer to that is—NO! All of the questions she answered were rehearsed by coaches assigned to her utilizing see Jane run see Dick run techniques. Remember the ones we used in first grade to remember our lessons by continuous rote? Anyway, keep drinking that GOP Kool-Aid, hold hands and sing, Kumbayah! While America crashes!

Someone’s sleeping, Yah, kumbaya
Someone’s sleeping, Yah, kumbaya
Someone’s sleeping, Yah, kumbaya
Oh Yah, kumbaya
Oh Yah, kumbaya

October 7, 2008 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll, Uncategorized | | No Comments Yet

The GOP Failure: Part One!

whose-watch
“Righteousness exalts a nation; But sin is a reproach to any people.” Proverbs 14:34

Well, the dust has settled in the Presidential Election 2008? And, not everyone is happy with the results. President Elect Obama could prove to be a surprise in spite of his stereotyping by the also-ran GOP and its’ stagnant candidates. Perhaps Obama will be a cross between President Abraham Lincoln and Dr. Martin Luther King with the best of each one residing within. One can only hope! Some of the early assessments have revealed a pragmatic individual with great discipline. These are not bad qualities, and not usually found in any true liberal. President Elect Obama is also considered to be highly intelligent, as is his wife. Both of these individuals are Law School graduates but neither was born with the proverbial silver spoon in their mouth with everything handed to them. Their lessons in life were hard, but remembered. As aforementioned, he (they) may surprise everyone and actually do a very good job considering the financial mess they inherited from the GOP et al. “First of all, then, I urge you to offer petitions, prayers, intercessions, and expressions of thanks for all people, for kings, and for everyone who has authority, so that we might lead a quiet and peaceful life with all holiness and dignity.” 1 Timothy 2:1-2

Just where did the GOP fail? On several fronts the answers can be found to this question, the first being a broad and blatant deviation from the proven agenda of President Ronald W. Reagan. President Reagan basically reformatted the GOP into proven workable governance. His rule and correct political guidance if followed by succeeding GOP candidates would have insured GOP domination for generations to come. However, it was not too long afterward that President Reagan’s teachings and work was undone by his own chosen successor, George Bush forty-one. Bush forty-one did the unthinkable as per the Reagan formula for continued success; he raised taxes after promising not to do so! And he then lost the next election cycle to a Democrat candidate. However, the GOP continued to make serious mistakes in their politics and ideals for rulership as per the Newt Gingrich Congressional revolution of 1994, the “Contract with America.”

Under the leadership of Gingrich the campaign was run on ideas and values such as tax cuts, a bigger military, tough on crime and welfare. This campaign gained the GOP fifty-four seats to take control of Congress, ending forty years of Democratic rule. However, according to the Cook Political Report, this really wasn’t quite as influential as the Republicans like to say it is. But these noble aspirations only went so far under the leadership of Newt Gingrich, why? It is said great men have feet of clay and Gingrich is no exception. “Gingrich, who ran for Congress in 1978 on the slogan, “Let Our Family Represent Your Family.” (He was reportedly cheating on his first wife at the time). In 1995, an alleged mistress from that period, Anne Manning, told Vanity Fair’s Gail Sheehy: “We had oral sex. He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, ‘I never slept with her.’” Gingrich obtained his first divorce in 1981, after forcing his wife, who had helped put him through graduate school, to haggle over the terms while in the hospital, as she recovered from uterine cancer surgery” (washingtonmonthly.com, 2006). “He that commits adultery with a woman is void of understanding: He that does it would destroy his own soul. Wounds and dishonor shall he get; and his reproach shall not be wiped away.” Proverbs 6:32-33.

Well the media can always be blamed for the GOP’s failure, can’t they? Another reality check on the recent election came from well respected Fox News reporter Shepherd Smith. “Fox News anchor Shepard Smith, host of the highest-rated evening newscast on cable television, calls suggestions of a bias toward Barack Obama by the mainstream media “preposterous.” His sentiment was aired out during a roundtable discussion on his network’s “Strategy Room” program. During the discussion, comedian Nick DiPaolo said, “The mainstream media being so in the tank for Obama ….” “Oh, please. That’s preposterous,” interrupted Smith. “The mainstream media reflected what was happening in this nation. It did not drive it. The blogs didn’t drive this movement. The media did not drive this movement. Barack Obama did not lose this election. It was his to lose. It was not John McCain’s to win.

“The Republicans had no shot unless the Democrats gave it to them, and they didn’t. And to blame the media is a copout and ridiculous. We are always here to be blamed for people like you who enjoy that activity. We always will be. When the Democrats lost last time, it was our fault. When the Republicans lost this time, it’s our fault. It’s not. The nation was changing. Barack Obama did not lose, therefore John McCain did, and that’s it.” DiPaolo responded, “The major media has been liberal since its inception. It’s years and years of pounding.” “How did George Bush win twice?” asked Smith. “I don’t know,” answered DiPaolo. “[Ex-Bush strategist] Karl Rove is a genius, I guess” (wnd.com, 2008). The media cannot be blamed for this election defeat.

So; where did the GOP go wrong? Actually; where did they go right? The GOP takes the moral high ground but yet they have several office holders during the past eight years (and beyond) that proved to be moral reprobates, and the last two candidates, McCain and Palin are no exceptions to the continued immorality that pervades the quasi moralistic GOP! Don’t exposit morals when members of your party are amoral! And incidentally, where were the Evangelicals this election cycle? Usually they support and endorse the GOP candidates (sometimes reluctantly) but, this time they were noticeably quiet. Perhaps they are fatigued by the immorality within the GOP? I’ll have more to say on this next time.

November 13, 2008 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | , | No Comments Yet

The GOP Failure: Part Two!

casket-copy
“Righteousness exalts a nation; But sin is a reproach to any people.” Proverbs 14:34

So; where did the GOP go wrong? Actually; where did they go right? The GOP takes the moral high ground but yet they have several office holders during the past eight years (and beyond) that proved to be moral reprobates, and the last two candidates, McCain and Palin are no exceptions to the continued immorality that pervades the quasi moralistic GOP! Don’t exposit morals when members of your party are amoral! In review from part 1 we ended on the amorality of the GOP. So, what about the last two candidates fielded by the GOP for the office of President and Vice-President, what are they doing? Well, McCain is in therapy for his loss (the GOP does not handle losses very well either) and Palin is taking Fifth Grade classes to catch up and be better prepared should the GOP be stupid enough to knock on her door again! For crying out loud GOP she’s a (quasi) beauty queen, and comparatively speaking where does that take you intellectually? Duh! Remember Miss Teen USA 2007 – South Carolina Lauren Caitlin Upton? And these two were compared (accurately?) during the election cycle! Need I say more?

Now, to get back to point as to the loss suffered by the GOP in the Presidential race, some Senate seat races et al. The classic example and criminal mentality of Alaska, can be found in defeated (finally!) Ted Stevens. Stevens although convicted of seven felonies was almost re-elected by Alaska voters. The percentages were Begich 47.76 percent and Stevens 46.58 percent. That dear people is only 1.18%! A very narrow margin! So, Alaska voters (46.58% anyway) are willing to overlook the criminality of Ted Stevens, and that says a lot about the mentality of Alaska citizens. This of course was confirmed by the academic exposure of their Governor, you betcha Sarah Palin! I think the constituency in Alaska vote with their other head, not the one that sits on their shoulders either. So, this is a major obstacle for the GOP, crooks and convicted felon (s) in their party. Remember that McCain was/is an adulterer by confession and also a traitor on record. You want this for your party’s representation? This was/is another problem for the GOP.

What about Mark Foley? Foley the U.S. Representative from Florida engaged in sexually-explicit SMS text-messaging with 17-YO males, former pages. Can the GOP justify and sustain such conduct and still be a viable political party? And of recent memory is that old foot tapping/touching Ex-Senator from Idaho, Larry Craig. Is this the kind of conduct that best exemplifies the GOP? Can the GOP regain their lost political ground with this in the party? Personally, I am so disgusted by the behavior of elected officials at every level in the GOP that I could not vote for them in the last election. And, I have been a staunch Republican all of my political life beginning at the age I could first vote, 21! I could not even hold my nose this election cycle and vote for the likes of McCain et al. I most certainly could not vote for the other party either. I do like President-Elect Obama, however, I cannot concur with some of his political policies or ideologies. His selections for Cabinet positions go beyond reason. How can he tout change while bringing back Clinton posers and wannabes? Do we need a second dose of the Clinton travesty? I think not! I will have more to say next time!

November 21, 2008 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Constitution 101

bo_birth_certificate2-copy
“Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?” Job 38:2
“He that gives answer before he hears, It is folly and shame unto him.” Proverbs 18:13

Many commentators today speak errantly and without knowledge. They report the matter as it suits their agenda or goal. Recently, there has been a push on to try the veracity of President Elect Obama’s citizenship requirements. Obama taught Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. From the University’s own press release the following applies.

“UC Law School statement: The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as “Senior Lecturer.” From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.” (http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html)

What I am saying is simply (and it must be kept simple) this, someone that taught Constitutional Law would most certainly know what the Constitution says, wouldn’t they? And knowing what it says in Article II Section 1 would they believe themselves to be qualified for the office of the President of the United States of America? What does this portion of the Constitution actually say? The part in question is stated simply (and for the people challenging this (Barack’s eligibility) it must be kept simple…real simple).

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;… Article II Section 1.

What does this actually say? “Except a natural born citizen, OR a citizen of the United States.” The part that keeps turning up missing is the “OR a citizen…” The focus and accent is on the “natural born” part by the (quasi) as it were educated challengers to Obama’s citizenship. Let us examine the facts, shall we? From the State Department’s Website on Citizenship the following applies, providing it becomes necessary!

“Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship By a Child Born Abroad:

Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock: A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) INA provided the citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child’s birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.” (http://travel.state.gov/law/info/info_609.html).

Now let’s follow the timeline of Barack’s mother.

Born:
Stanley Ann Dunham
November 29, 1942
Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, US

Moved to Hawaii:
1960 (18 years of age)

Married:
February 2, 1961 to Barack Obama Sr.

Gave Birth in Hawaii:
August 4, 1961, (age 18) to Barack Obama II

All of the aforementioned occurred within the United States of America as Hawaii was a state since 1959. We will examine more timeline information for clarity’s sake.

Ann Dunham Timeline:

1942
November 29, 1942: Ann Dunham is born Stanley Dunham in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Her parents are Stanley Armour Dunham and Madelyn Dunham. Her father names his daughter Stanley after himself because he wanted a son. When she’s 18, Stanley, who doesn’t like her boyish name, starts introducing herself as Ann.

1956
Ann Dunham is 13. Her family moves to Mercer Island, Washington, so Ann can attend a new high school that has recently opened. Ann spends 8th grade through high school on Mercer Island. Ann is deeply influenced by two of her teachers: Val Foubert and Jim Wichterman. Foubert, English teacher, and Wichterman, philosophy teacher, encouraged their students to challenge authority and societal norms. The reading list provided by them included: Atlas Shrugged, 1984, and The Communist Manifesto. Parents on Mercer Island were outraged and tried to have Foubert and Wichterman fired. During high school years Ann Dunham states she is an atheist and that she is not interested in getting married or having children.

1960
Ann Dunham is 18. Her family moves to Honolulu, Hawaii. Ann begins classes at the University of Hawaii.

- She meets Barack Obama Sr. in a Russian-language class. Barack Obama Sr. is a foreign student from Kenya, who has a magnetic personality. Barack Obama Sr. is very opinionated, talkative and passionate. The two start dating.

- Ann tells her parents about her African boyfriend and they invite him for dinner.

1961
February 2, 1961: Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. get married in Maui in a discreet ceremony. Nobody is invited. At the time of the wedding Ann is already three months pregnant with Barack Obama Jr.

August 4, 1961: Barack Obama Jr. is born. Ann is eighteen. She drops out of college after one semester in the University of Hawaii.

1962
When Barack Obama Jr. is 1, his father, Barack Obama sr., leaves the family and goes to Harvard to pursue a Ph.D. in economics.

- When Barack Obama Jr. is almost 2, Ann returns to college. Her parents help take care of baby Barack. Money is tight.

- Ann meets Lolo Soetoro at the University of Hawaii. Lolo is a foreign student from Indonesia.

1964
Ann files for divorce from Barack Obama Sr. and he signs the papers.

Again; all of this occurs while Barack Obama’s mother is a United States citizen dwelling within the United Sates for more than twenty (20) years! And, according to the State Department’s website this also satisfies the requirements if the child was born elsewhere, such as outside of the United States. Either way Barack Obama is a citizen of the United States of America by law and by birth. This at the minimum satisfies the OR factor of Article II Section 1 clause on qualifications for candidacy of the office of President.

It remains to be seen what will happen or where it will end, but it seems to be an effort in vain as the challenge to Obama’s citizenship was tossed from several courts already including review by SCOTUS Justice David Souter. However, as sore losers go, they want their pound of flesh. The current charge and whining is led by Alan Keyes, Senate and Presidential contender and loser to both offices, and World Net Daily, another sore loser website. It’s not about Constitution or about Constitutional Law or they would have challenged some serious violations of the Constitution by the Bush Administration et al. It is personal against Obama! They have tried everything they could to discredit the man and his candidacy. They tried to use subversive propaganda by desperately attaching an appellative to him such as “he is a Muslim.” They tried to paint him as a Chicago thug and connected to questionable people and hard dirty politics; Chicago style. However, to date, it has failed to work. And, I do not think the latest attempt will either. So, what’s left? If everything else fails they will either have him assassinated or try to have him assassinated! Remember who these people are, and write their names into an investigative file as suspect in collaboration to murder in cold blood President Barack Obama. And that will make our job much easier because we know who you are, and where you live! It will not go down like the JFK assassination; we won’t stand for it this time! So, keep track of those involved in this (quasi) Constitutional challenge, and then place them on the suspect or person (s) of interest list! Remember, hatred and envy is powerful motivators.

November 27, 2008 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | , , | 2 Comments

Things You Cannot Change!

storm5-text1

“Yahweh, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to know the difference.” There are those setting about to change decrees and rulers because they don’t like them. Who do you suppose sets the things in order in the expanse of this universe? Who do you suppose sets up the nations leaders? Do you really think that you as an individual human being actually set in place the leaders of this country called America? Do you really believe that your vote at the last Presidential election was what caused the next President of the United States to be elected and set up as America’s new ruler? Or; do you really know how these positions come about or are allocated? “…until you know that the Most High rules in the kingdom of men, and gives it to whomsoever he will.” Daniel 4:32.

This was spoken by a Heavenly Angel to a ruler called Nebuchadnezzar. It appears that he became arrogant in his position and failed to acknowledge who was actually in control and where his position and power of that position was derived from. He needed a lesson in humility so, he was temporarily disposed of his position and driven away from mankind and became as one of the beasts of the field. After a period called seven times (seven years) he finally looked up, gave the glory and praise to the Most High, and his senses was restored and he was given back the kingdom that he once ruled. For many of us that is the truth and we believe that the Most High rules and controls the human race. However, there are those who do not believe this and think their power and position comes from their own efforts and they are the ones who set themselves into positions of leadership and authority. “Rulers and nobles rule by me, and all the judges of the earth.” Proverbs 8:16

It appears that there is a concerted effort orchestrated by individuals that think they can change what has occurred in the last election cycle. Mostly, these are arrogant and ignorant people whining over the GOP losses. Whose fault is this? Did the GOP put the right candidate into the race? Would the GOP candidate this cycle be selected by the Most High as His choice for President? Well, the answer to this can be found in the results. Who is now the President Elect? There is a plan set in motion by the higher authority that cannot be changed by anyone in the human race at this time. No matter how hard you try, His will cannot be altered! Consider time and circumstance that accompanied each Presidential selection from George Washington to Barack Obama. Do you believe or understand why each man was selected in his time? Was President Abraham Lincoln selected for his time and the subsequent troubles that accompanied his tenure in office? How about President Truman, do you believe that he was chosen for a time and hour? How did WW2 end? Who was partly responsible for the Japanese surrender?

I must assure you that all events from the beginning of this great country America have been controlled by a power beyond our understanding, our comprehension! Every sequence of events during America’s existence has been guarded and controlled by decisions that kept everything on a predetermined course. No matter what anyone tries to do to change the course of America’s fate or direction in the coming events, they will fail. Here is a prophecy that reveals America’s part in the destruction of the descendants of Esau. “And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for straw. And they shall burn among them and consume them. And no survivor shall be to the house of Esau, for Yahweh has spoken.” Obadiah 1:18. Is this a coincidence that America and Great Britain took the lead in the Arab crisis of this current war? The descendants of Esau will become a waste and desolation, burned by fire at the hand of the descendants of Jacob (the twelve tribes) and the house of Joseph, which are also known as America and Great Britain! Do you suppose you can change this? Do you suppose that you can select and install the correct leaders for this coming event? No, there is absolutely nothing that you or I can do to change anything of this order and nature.

And grant me the serenity to change the things that I can, and; the wisdom to know the difference!

December 1, 2008 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Hatred and Envy Yields Libel and Slander!

hatred-gaylin
“Wrath is cruel, and anger is outrageous; but who is able to stand before envy?” Proverbs 27:4

Why are some people filled with hatred and envy? It seems that anyone who would become successful in life becomes a target of failures and ne’er-do-wells. In order to bring you down to their levels many hateful individuals will resort to any manoeuver including propaganda, libel, slander, and outright lies. The terms for these evil overtures are, libel if printed, and slander if spoken. Warren Buffet says it takes twenty years to build a good reputation and only five minutes to destroy it. In this modern day of internet obfuscation and pseudo names, libelous statements can be posted with seeming impunity! Or; is this true? No; because eventually these hateful envious people can be caught and prosecuted. There is a line in the First Amendment to the Constitution that cannot be crossed. Not everything said or published is protected under the free speech clause. What is hatred and what kind of person(s) publish hateful libelous statements or make slanderous statements. First, these kinds of people are considered to be low rent in stature, mostly losers and failures. Maybe a definition would help to explain hatred and the mental state of hateful people?

1. “Hatred is clearly and most obviously an emotion, an intense emotion, that is, a passion. To better understand hatred, it is helpful to have some sophisticated understanding of human emotions—the irrational underpinnings of human behavior and the darker side of the human spirit.

2. Hatred is more than an emotion. It is also a psychological condition; a disorder of perception; a form of quasi- delusional thinking. Therefore, to understand the condition of hatred, one must understand the nature of a delusion, a symptom of severe mental disease. One must examine the meaning of the paranoid shift that is central to the thinking of a hating individual and a culture of hatred. This examination will lead us into the somewhat bizarre world of symptom formation.

3. Finally, hatred requires an attachment. Like love, it needs an object. The choice of an object—also like love—may be rational or irrational. Obsessive hatred is by definition irrational. The choice of the victim is more often dictated by the unconscious needs and the personal history of the hater than by the nature, or even the actions, of the hated.”

HATRED: The Psychological Descent into Violence
WILLARD GAYLIN, M.D. (2003)

Notice point number two. Hatred is a form of “a severe mental disease.” And, it usually needs an object to focus that hatred on! And if that is someone of any success or of high moral standards (above their own), they will try and destroy the object (person(s)) of their hatred. And they will use low level subversive tactics to propagate their vitriolic slander. And, they will post libelous statements under pseudonyms on any low level website forum(s) they can find that will allow it! One should never believe everything you hear or read! In legal processes, evidences are presented to condemn or to exonerate anyone accused of a crime. However, in the minds of people filled with hatred and envy, it doesn’t matter! It is how they see it that matters in their demented little world! Here is what Plutarch, On ‘Envy and Hate’ has to say.

“[1] Envy and hatred are passions so like each other that they are often taken for the same. And generally, vice has (as it were) many hooks, whereby it gives unto those passions that hang thereto many opportunities to be twisted and entangled with one another; for as differing diseases of the body agree in many like causes and effects, so do the disturbances of the mind. He who is in prosperity is equally an occasion of grief to the envious and to the malicious man; therefore we look upon benevolence, which is a willing our neighbor’s good, as an opposite to both envy and hatred, and fancy these two to be the same because they have a contrary purpose to that of love. But their resemblances make them not so much one as their unlikeness makes them distinct. Therefore we endeavor to describe each of them apart, beginning at the original of either passion.

[2] Hatred proceeds from an opinion that the person we hate is evil, if not generally so, at least in particular to us. For they who think themselves injured are apt to hate the author of their wrong; yea, even those who are reputed injurious or malicious to others than ourselves we usually nauseate and abhor. But envy has only one sort of object, the felicity of others. Whence it becomes infinite, and, like an evil or diseased eye, is offended with everything that is bright. On the other hand, hatred is always determined by the subject it adheres to.” (Plutarch circa 45 – 125 C.E.) Priest of the Delphic Oracle.

Many criminal acts are perpetrated because of hate and envy, murder being one of the primary crimes committed. And it becomes even worse if the crime is pre-meditated! And hatred and envy can be expanded by demented individuals to commit this heinous act! Consider the following passage from the Bible whence the precedent for the pre-meditated murder concept originates. “And if a man hates his neighbor, and lies in wait for him, and rises up against him, and strikes his life from him, so that he dies, and flees to one of these cities, then the elders of his city shall send and bring from him there, and give him into the hand of the avenger of blood, that he may die. Your eye shall not pity him, but you shall put away the innocent blood from Israel, and it shall be well with you.” Deuteronomy 19:11-13. And, you had better believe that some people are so filled with hatred that they would actually murder the object(s) of their hatred and envy should the opportunity present itself! And they lay in wait lurking on the internet forums expressing their hate and evil desires for innocent people! Thus, the hatred and envy concept/emotion when played out to the fullest evil extent can and will bring death! “For he knew they delivered Him up through envy.” Matthew 27:18 And thus it was said of a man known as the Messiah! This is where envy and hatred ultimately leads.

December 15, 2008 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll, Uncategorized | , , , | No Comments Yet

Balancing the Budget and Cutting Costs!

Illegal Immigrants

Illegal Immigrants

With the disintegration of America’s financial resources, the governments state and federal must find ways to cut costs. The employment rate is around 7.2% and rising, while the current population of America stands at approximately (according to US Census Bureau Population Clock) 305,576,445. And, the World population is 6,752,489,013; and this figure is approaching seven billion people on planet earth. What can be understood by these statistical dynamics? First, the employment rate is almost 93%, and that is a good sign. The unemployment rate from 1929-1933 was 25%. However, the population during that era was around 122 million and Herbert Clark Hoover was President. By contrast the 1900 population census numbered only 76 million people. And now the US has increased over four times since the 1900 census. So, what is the answer to reducing the operating costs at every level? The answer may not be palatable because some of the cost cutting measures may be considered too Draconian.

The first thing that must be done is to forgive the debt burden of every tax-paying citizen of the United States as long as they are legal citizens every seven years. The debt on anything of substantive value should not be financed beyond seven years. This means houses, cars, credit cards etc. How could anyone make payments that would be considered astronomical with reduced payment periods such as seven years you may be thinking? One thing of note; the houses, cars, along with other costly items, are grossly overpriced. This is now being seen in the housing “bubble” collapse. And, this will be seen in future goods devaluations. Right now there are many (thousands and thousands) new automobiles in dealership lots across America that is not being sold. What are the car manufacturers going to do with these and future models, let them just sit? The car prices along with most merchandise are grossly over-inflated, pricewise. Somehow the entire economy must be reduced to reasonable pricing, and that includes wages and benefit packages. But, will this happen? The financial control resides within a select elite circle of individuals worldwide. These financiers are recalcitrant obdurate mortals that reject the delineated precept, “At the end of every seven years you shall make a release. And this is the manner of the release: every creditor shall release that which he has lent unto his neighbor” (Deuteronomy 15:1-2). And because of their continued refusal to release people from their debts every seven years, the financial institution (s) will ultimately completely crash. There will be nothing of value and that includes gold, silver and precious stones etc. This will be the worst time in the history of the world.

Another cost cutting measure is to reduce the current illegal immigrant population via deportations. If they are not legal; deport them! Oh, some might think that a massive legal immigration policy would be the adaptive measure to ensure that these illegal immigrants will not be deported. Is this the answer and or solution, no, emphatically no! And the why is easily explained with loss of jobs, low production of crops because of natural disasters that are increasing on a yearly basis. And that will leave masses of people without food and without jobs. So, a reduction of approximately 12 Million illegal immigrants would free up some of America’s resources such as jobs, health care, housing, welfare, and a plethora of other commodities and services received free by illegal immigrants that true Americans cannot even receive albeit native by birth and lineage. The illegal immigrants (each one) had a country of their own and decided to evacuate that country to come to America to receive what? A better life, a better education, a better health care system, better overall living conditions? Yes, but at what cost to America’s true people? Being perfectly honest brings one to hard decisions. America cannot support these illegal people and neither should they have too! America has implemented a system whereby immigrants can become legal. Any true American cannot be opposed to legal immigration, can they? One would hope not! However, the reality of it all must be considered!

It is going to be a sad moment in the history of America when the aforementioned illegal deportation takes place. And, this is not being said by yours truly here. No, a Higher Power has spoken concerning the future events of America and the world, but who will heed? I leave you with this prophecy to consider. “So I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall move out of its place, in the wrath of Yahweh of Hosts, and in the day of His fierce anger. And it shall be as a gazelle driven away, and as a sheep no one gathers; each man shall look to his own people, and each one shall flee to his own land. Everyone who is found shall be pierced through; yes, everyone who is swept away shall fall by the sword” (Isaiah 13:13-15 LITV). Yes, they shall flee to their own land, and if they are found they shall be pierced through. Consider; if the Military is sent to round up the illegal immigrants, what action would they take if necessary? And if the US Military cannot bring itself to follow directives, they will bring in soldiers from a foreign country (s) to accomplish the task. This prophecy will not remain unfulfilled!

January 15, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll, Uncategorized | | No Comments Yet

IS IT SOCIALISM NOW?

american-flag-copy

With the elections now history, one can only wonder what course will be taken. People were dissatisfied with the current administration, so they opted for change. But..? Will the change be a positive, or will it be a negative for America and the world? The party now coming into power, will be one you just might not like. I just don’t think the voting majority in true reality; know what they have actually done, all things considered.

And old adage comes to mind, “be careful what you pray for, you just might get it.” With the attitude of change and betrayal you might think of Stephen’s words in the book of Acts: “And they stoned Stephen, calling upon Yahweh, and saying, Sovereign Yahshua, receive my spirit. And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Yahweh; lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep.” Acts 7:59-60

Perhaps the people stoned the Republican Party? Perhaps they also do not know what they were doing either? The price will be high for this action. Putting the Republicans in the Minority could bring catastrophic results, if history is any indicator. However, the loss incurred by the GOP was self-inflicted. If they were more selective on their candidacy and selection thereof, the election might have gone in their favor instead of against. Running John McCain (John McCooCoo, John McCrazy) was not a wise choice as is now evidenced. The party now in charge is comprised of many Socialists/Communists believers and inclinationists, because in all reality; there is no difference between either. In times past you could tell the difference, but; with the socialistic infiltration of the Democratic Party, and now the GOP also, the change is or will be obvious.

Few people remember the agenda employed by active abortion on demand proponents or the relentless pressure to promulgate the homosexual agenda either. They wanted to make the Republican Party change their ideas on both of these issues, so; they infiltrated the Republican Party and the rest is historically apparent. This agenda driven infiltration, occurred during the 1980’s. The liberal moderate agenda pursued by many Republicans today, has certainly cast a shadow of doubt on their ability to govern. And so it was taken away from them. There is no real or actual Republican Party. The GOP has dissolved into a moderate mass of nothing, and is being led by liberal minded fools! And the consequences of that can be seen with blind eyes!

Now enter the Democratic Party! What used to be their ideology and party agenda, has been compromised by the infiltration of Communist leaning (and practicing) personnel. The Democratic Party as America once knew it, is ancient history. With the socialist leanings of this party, one can only wonder when the pictures of Stalin, Lenin, or Karl Marx will make their appearance. Time will tell. Remember that Saul Alinsky was one of Hillary (the Secretary of State now) Clinton’s mentors. And Alinsky was an unabashed Communist/Socialist who never apologized for his practices and beliefs. It will be interesting to see who comes out of the closet now that the Democrats have the Presidency, the Senate, and the Congress. Because of this power consolidation that is now unchecked, we could be in some serious scat!

What really troubles me is the Liberal/Socialist/Communist agenda and standing on the abortion issue. Any country that murders its’ unborn or young is just asking for trouble and fire from Heaven. Also, the “Don’t ask don’t tell” Military issue and problem (for them) is really inconsequential; all things considered. The homosexual population overall is of relative insignificance because their actual numbers are vastly over-stated. However, when you have these types in high positions (think Barney Frank here) their voice becomes much louder. They don’t want you to impose the straight heterosexual lifestyle on them! However, they force theirs on us by their constant demands; demands to be recognized and enjoy the same rights that were endowed by a wise Creator upon people who believe the sanctity of marriage should only be enjoyed by a man and woman coming together in conjugation!

President Obama is in a unique place in history. He appears at a time of crisis. He touts Abraham Lincoln as one of his childhood idols. However, if he is going to model himself after President Lincoln, well and good. President Lincoln was an honorable man who laid his life on the line believing that no man should be a slave, and that all men were created equal. But know this President Obama, President Abraham Lincoln was no Socialist! President Lincoln was no abortionist! And President Lincoln was no sodomite, and I most seriously doubt that he would endorse gay rights and activities. So, President Obama, if you are going to model/pattern yourself after this great man, then you should do what he would have done. And in doing this Mr. President, you too could lose your life also! Perhaps just like him in your second term, déjà vu? Good people lay down their lives for what is right, and they never, ever, capitulate! There is a reason for you and this time! There is a reason for your adoration of President Lincoln, and now President Obama it is time for you to return this country to its greatness. Refuse the socialist agenda and its doomed governance! Rule this country as would President Abraham Lincoln!

January 22, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll, Uncategorized | | No Comments Yet

I Have…Had a Dream Too…But You Destroyed it!

destroyed-house
Dr. Martin Luther King had a dream for the people, that everyone would be equal in the eyes of the Most High! The day that he dreamed about came true this past Presidential cycle. However, it remains to be seen if this is a true Dr. King dream or; a nightmare in the making! I am referencing the new president Barack Obama with this thought. What he will do for or against the American dream is yet to be determined. We all want the best for our country and the good citizens therein, don’t we? The American dream contains success for diligent people willing to work hard for it but, is this dream realistic today? Can we work hard and have our own home, our own car? What about a retirement account free from scams, banking vandalism, and covert schemes? Can I retire and be free from debt because everything is paid for? Or; is this no longer possible? Have the dreams that one holds for their life and family now become unobtainable? Have they destroyed our dreams because of their (some people’s) avarice and insatiable desire for amassing great wealth at other people’s expense?

Today the housing has been inflated beyond true value wherein no average person can conceivably afford one. The automobile market is about the same…who can afford an automobile at current prices. And, after a brief period the vehicle is no longer worth its initial value or asking price. Everything goes up in price, but not wages. Workers are either making too much say some or very little say most. Minimum wages are not capable of sustaining a household of two adults and two children. And any dream (s) that the minimum wage earner might have is impossible to achieve. Why is there such disparity and class division/distinction in America? It there a glass ceiling that cannot be penetrated by the hard working masses of America? Is there a restricted level that someone cannot arise above? Today I believe there is a stopping point for most sans any extended education such as a college degree, or; personal access to inordinate amounts of wealth.

What could be the long term solution for this discrimination against the working class people? Could the housing market create affordable homes? Could the car manufacturers build good yet inexpensive cars? Could the minimum wage be raised to the actual living standard that balances between accounts receivable (wages) and accounts payable/expendable (debts)? Yes, all of this is possible if the quasi establishment wants it to be so! I am not saying that Americans should be forced into shacks and the people’s car as per Germany during the WW2 era. How much of a house does the standard American family actually need? It appears that a four bedroom two bath home would be sufficient for most families in America today. Gone for the most part (sans illegal immigrants) are large families.

The average home size is another factor to consider. From 900-1200(60’s-80’s) square feet to over 2400 square feet today, the home size has accelerated in size. If the average family is 4 or even 5 per household, how much room does one family actually need? If you have ever spent any time in a third-world country you would simply be amazed at how little space in land and housing is available to them. The houses are small 3-4 rooms and the land is big enough to plant a small garden with some chickens-perhaps! So let’s look at necessity pricewise and repayment possibilities on a home loan. The median price of homes in December 2008 was around $242,000.00. So, loosely calculated the monthly mortgage payment could/would be around $1,800.00 all things included such as taxes, insurance etc. Now let’s extend that times 12 months, and this equals $21,000.00. Using mid-2009 minimum wage projections of $7.25 with some (a few) states having a slightly higher rate from $8.00 to $8.55 per hour rate, we arrive at approx. $15,060.00 based on 40 hours per week labor, and $18,850.00 at 50 hours per week. Now let’s factor in wages versus expenses, starting with mortgage payments.

At $1,800.00 (approx.) times 12 months for yearly house payment demand, the total comes to $21,000.00. We can end it right there, for to proceed any further is an exercise in futility. Wages based on 50 hours per week time 52 weeks equals $18,850.00 and house mortgage payments for one year are $21,000.00 leaving the average wage earner MINUS -$2,150.00. Now this figure does not include anything else and it is based on the average home value and the minimum wage today in America. Now do you see what I am saying that the American dream realistically is no longer attainable? The average or median wage as of August 2008 was $50,233.00. Now we can take this figure and factor in car payments (usually times two per household) mortgage payment, utilities, food, transportation costs and several day to day necessary living expenses and still see a problem. More on this later…Can we still achieve the American dream or has that dream become shattered/destroyed by the avariciousness of several unscrupulous companies and the owners thereof..?

February 2, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Should We Just Do Nothing?

foreclosure2
The new President just manoeuvered and signed into effect a massive package that will affect us all. Was this the right thing to do? We have seen America, along with other countries, under great financial duress. Also, the jobs that Americans once occupied have been taken to other countries such as Mexico, China, and Asia et al. Whether you agree or disagree, something had to be done. Notwithstanding, the opposition party has no immediate answers or solutions forthcoming to date. The GOP pushes (forces) Capitalism coupled with tax reductions specifically designed to benefit the wealthy as their redemptive agenda for the current dilemma. The capital gains tax is always at the forefront of the quasi tax reductions sought after and virtually begged for by the capitalists. However, in the midst of this current economic crisis I personally have yet to hear or read about an alternative to the Democratic Party’s proposal. In other words what would be the GOP’s plan and course of action for America’s economic crisis? First, I want to make one thing clear before proceeding any farther, I am not in favor of the Democrats massive bail-out program. However, I would like to see (or hear) a viable proposal that would address the issues we as Americans now face! Is Capitalism the answer to our current quandary/predicament? What is capitalism?

cap•i•tal•ism [ káppit'l ìzzəm ] noun
Definition:

Free-market system: an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and distribution of goods, characterized by a free competitive market and motivation by profit.
(http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary)

Okay, if we use this definition as a reference, we will ascertain that capitalism is a system controlled by those who own the means of production and the goods distributed by these means. However, the question is; who makes these goods and how are they initially produced? If we take for instance an example of farming and the resultant ends of producing marketable products such as produce, we insert into the capitalism equation, workers. The quasi private ownership of factories companies’ et al that produces and distributes these goods relies on labor to capitalize on or, draw advantage from the efforts of these compensated workers. But, the compensation can be brought into question and often becomes exploitive in nature by under compensating these workers. The problem as I see it with Capitalism is exploitation! It appears that capitalism in order to compensate these owners of factories, businesses (large) and any means of profit realization will do anything to enlarge their bottom (or profit) line! And, that means they will go to any foreign country to accomplish this avaricious goal! Am I against making money? No! However, I am against how this money sometimes is made!

What is troubling with capitalism is exploitation, victimizing America’s people for their own gain and comfort. When capitalists acquire our goods, goods that were produced in America by American labor, and then ship these same goods to another country such as China, and then use the CHEAP labor of the Chinese people to turn these same goods into a marketable product that is then re-shipped back to America, and then sold back to our own people, that is exploitation and perfidiousness of unconscionable dimension! We buy back our own goods at a large profit for the so-called capitalist enterprise system of supply and demand! Allow me to elucidate! If these same goods/products are produced in America and then taken to our own factories, the workers will receive compensation for their work effort. For examples sake we will use the $15.00 per hour as a reference. If the worker receives this wage times 40 hours for the average work week, they will have earned $600.00 before taxes. And if this same worker has a benefits package coupled with this wage allocation, this benefit package will naturally increase the workers compensation. Now, if these same goods are shipped to another country where the worker(s) only receive slave wages such as $2.00 per day as a reference, we can see gross exploitation by comparison. The foreign worker will receive $10.00 per week with no benefit package at all! The cost of shipping the goods and returning them to America to be re-sold to us is cost effective to the capitalist enterprise or it would not even be considered by them!

So, if we incorporate (pun intended) this into today’s financial dilemma we have a real problem. The price of goods and services in America has reached disproportionate levels. Houses are priced beyond value, and wages are also not balanced with America’s pricing demands. Some receive inordinate wages for doing nothing while the laborer who mows their lawns and nannies their children get virtually nothing in return compensation for their labor. All the while the cost of living increases but wages are not commensurate with the cost increases. So, where do we go from here and who has the solution to this disparate system of pecuniary resources? One of the major problems is debt and interest on these debts. A seven year cycle was integrated into the Torah Law for a good and specific purpose. This cycle teaches the forgiveness of debt every seven years. What this also teaches is how to live within a certain financial confine. You learn to live within your means! Forgiveness of debt is the only solution for today’s financial crisis/dilemma! All debts must be eradicated and a fresh start given. Then the seven year cycle must be implemented. Teaching people to live within their budgets must be taught as economics 101 in schools so children can learn financial responsibility at an early age. This current crushing system will collapse the entire world if debt relief is not integrated into the financial equation as a solution, mark my words!

February 20, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | , , | No Comments Yet

Trivial Matters!

modern-rome
The press and talk show hosts centered on the right or conservative wing of this country are focusing on trivial matters. While this country is being scrapped/buried by those who function behind the scene…those who function in darkness…those who actually control the world. Trivial matters and trivial pursuits are given to blind journalists and blind talk show hosts. Matters of consequence are irrelevant because these media institutions continue to be caught up in petty grievances of personal derivation. During the last election cycle an example of this could be seen with one of the more bombastic talk show hosts doing very little to ensure the GOP fielding the right candidate for the office of Presidency! Instead of upbraiding the GOP for selecting McCain, he basically retreated and accepted the matter and the rest is history. This talk show host et al should have used their audio media pulpit in bully fashion. They should have decried the GOP choice and made enough noise and concern to affect a change in candidacy. Again, this was relegated to the trivial matters area and almost all of these talk show hosts became less vocal (some became silent) and just fell in line with the rest of the GOP losers.

Now we can also see a dilemma in the coming evangelical collapse (http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0310/p09s01-coop.html). One of the major news providers on the Internet… World Net Daily… prides themselves on their Christian values. However, where are they on some of the more salient viable issues such as raising absolute hell about the stem cell decision made by the Obama administration? Why are issues that affect this entire nation relegated to the trivial pursuit file while nonsense such as Obama’s qualification to be President is incessantly expounded on? This has now become a shutting the door when the horse is already out of the barn. This matter should have been vetted prior to Obama’s presidential quest, shouldn’t it? If there were questions concerning his eligibility to seek the office of President, why were they not interrogated prior to the process? Should not this matter be resolved prior and not post election? And, subsequently, why was this not an issue when Barrack Obama ran against Hillary Clinton? Do you mean to tell me that Hillary as bad as she wanted that office did not know and use this against Obama? Let’s not forget who the current perpetrators of the dirty tricks squad really are and from whence they originate! The Clinton’s are masters at subterfuge and Saul Alinsky tactics for defaming and sullying anyone’s reputation if they so choose. One cannot believe that opportunity escaped the Clinton’s!

The quasi Evangelicals are basically cowards that do not want to rock the boat because they may lose their precious tax-exempt status…Section 501(c) (3) organizations are restricted in how much political and legislative (lobbying) activities they may conduct. If they lose their source of free unearned monies what will they do…? This brings to mind the true Savior’s words…” No servant is able to serve two masters; for either he will hate the one, and he will love the other; or he will cling to one, and he will despise the other. You are unable to serve Yahweh and mammon (money). And being lovers of money, the Pharisees (Teachers/Ministers/Evangelicals) also heard all these things; and they derided Him. And He said to them, you are those justifying yourselves before men, but Elohim knows your hearts; for the thing highly prized among men is a hateful thing before Yahweh.” Luke 16:14-15

So now there is a dilemma amongst the Evangelicals…cry out against sin as the Bible directs and lose their free money sources. Or; cry out against the abominations of this time such as stem cell research, abortion, unorthodox marriage relationships, and every evil work that stands in opposition to what the Bible really teaches! This also applies to those quasi religious based (so they say or want you to believe) Internet news sites. What are the real priorities of our time…President Obama’s qualifications to be president constitutionally? Or are there weightier matters that press us as a nation and people. There are conscionable choices that should and must be made. Are trivial matters and trivial pursuits of any consequence in the overall scheme of the current events that threaten to destroy our nation? The priorities must be realized and they must be interrogated for veracity and necessary attention.

Right now our nation is being turned into a Socialist country and it would not matter who was the president. If Hillary would have been elected the outcome would be the same. If a moderate Republican were elected…the outcome would be the same. Capitalism is a failure because they forgot who brought them to their positions of wealth. They have exploited the masses for their capital gains and forgot the workers who made them what they are. The exploitation was continued in third world and unmechanized nations such as China in bygone days. China was backward so the USA capitalists brought them up to date and used them for their own personal gain, again exploitation. And now they have no voice in the oval office and instead of trying to change and help the workers they took advantage of, they are now going to the government trough with their hands out begging for our tax money. What a mess we are in and all the while trivial matters take precedent over matters of national emergency. So, you talk show hosts keep ringing that vacuous bell of redundancy. And you writers/publishers keep on harping on matters that are insignificant to anyone but you while America is being destroyed within because the real matters are not brought forth as important, only the little things that personally annoy you are posited. All priorities concerning the aforementioned should be reconsidered…as America needs real men and women to sound the cry of truth of what matters are really important, not the redundant trivial matters.

March 11, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Ordinances Forgotten…or; Ignored?

throne
”Let every soul be subject to higher authorities, for there is no authority except from Elohim, but the existing authorities have been ordained by Yahweh. So that the one resisting authority has opposed the ordinance of Yahweh, and the ones opposing will receive judgment to themselves.” Romans 13:1-2
Why is it that supposed (quasi) Bible believing individuals really do not understand or even know what they believe or from whence comes their beliefs. Most will say that they believe what the Bible teaches, however, this is not always the case. Since President Obama was elected to the office of Presidency there has been a concerted movement to have him removed via lawsuits and or by fiat when the case arises to SCOTUS, if possible. Now…if you truly believe what the Bible teaches how do leaders become such…by the will of men or by the decree of the Supreme Ruler of the Universe? “But Yahweh is the judge; He puts down one and sets up another.” Psalm 75:7. So, how does this fit in the scheme of things concerning rulers of the countries of the world? Depending on what you believe concerning the selection and ordination of rulers is how you will react to any leader in any position.

One element that is sorely lacking is respect for the chosen leaders of the assorted countries in this current world and system of things. If you truly believe the Bible could you lift up your hand against Yahweh’s anointed? Meaning the one that He sets up to be the ruler of any given country at any time in history past, and present. My point is this! In all good conscience can one actually say they believe what the Bible teaches and treat rulers with disdain and disrespect? It comes to this…if you say you believe in the Bible’s teachings and you challenge, disparage, and maltreat the one that is elected to the office of the President of the United States, you are a lying hypocrite. One of the major…main reasons that I personally despise John McCain is because of the disrespect that he openly showed the past President George Bush. McCain is a supposed military man supposedly serving this country and vows/displays allegiance to America and the high office of the President…but does he? No, absolutely not! He revealed his true colors when he displayed a total attitude of disrespect to then President Bush. And…President Bush was the Commander in Chief of the military! What does that say about the true morals and beliefs of John McCain? Plenty! Ever wonder why some leaders just go cuckoo? Read the following passage.

“And you shall be driven from men, and your dwelling shall be with the beasts of the field. You shall be fed with the grass like oxen, and seven times shall pass over you until you know that the Most High is Ruler in the kingdom of men, and that He gives it to whomever He desires.” Daniel 4:32 This leader in Daniel’s era was sent away to become as a beast without reason. From the office of King to the pastures of a beast, and an animal’s mind all because he failed to remember who does what in this earth. The resolution is in this, And at the end of days, I Nebuchadnezzar lifted up my eyes to Heaven, and my understanding returned to me, and I blessed the Most High, and I praised and honored Him who lives forever, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and His rule is from generation to generation.” Daniel 4:34 Yes, his understanding returned when he acknowledged the source of all powers whether that be in the Heaven’s above or on earth beneath.
Now I ask you, Farah, Keyes et al, do you really think you are doing the right thing in challenging the President’s elected position? I mean from the standpoint that you both (or so you say) believe what the Bible teaches? I will caution all of you to be very careful what you do with this man. How do you know if this man falls into the following or not? Romans 9:17 “For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very thing I raised you up, so that I might display My power in you, and so that My name might be publicized in all the earth.” (Ex. 9:16) If this man is one of the final leaders on this earth…you do believe that the Kingdom is soon to come don’t you? How then can you in all good conscience challenge (ATTACK) the President under the guise of ineligible by constitutional requirements. Where in Heaven’s Name were the Congress, the Senate, America when this man should have been vetted prior to even entering the race for President? I would if I were you rethink your entire position on this because you are going to find yourself in opposition to the true Kingmaker…Yahweh!

I will leave you with one more thought…one more warning from scripture…the words of Zechariah 12:3 “And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all the peoples; all that burden themselves with it shall be sore wounded; and all the nations of the earth shall be gathered together against it.” Every person that has tried to bring about the division of Jerusalem and who wants to controvert the Jewish people’s rights have failed because eventually they are taken to task as this passage says. Hillary Clinton will find herself on the wrong side of this Palestinian foolishness she is now perpetrating. In opposing the Jewish state by calling for a Palestinian statehood she is in effect siding with those who want Israel’s demise. And do you believe in Jerusalem…Israel and the punishment you will receive if you try to harm these people?

April 13, 2009 Posted by Gary McAvin | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet